On Day 3 of the third Check match between India and New Zealand, Rishabh Pant‘s dismissal sparked vital controversy, drawing consideration from South Africa cricket legend AB de Villiers. He voiced his ideas on X (previously Twitter), questioning the choice and the expertise used within the recreation.
Rishabh Pant’s controversial wicket on Day 3 of third Check
Pant was dismissed within the twenty second over of India’s second innings, a pivotal second because the group pursued a aggressive goal. Ajaz Patel bowled to Pant, who tried to step down the pitch however was caught by wicketkeeper Tom Blundell. Patel and the New Zealand group erupted in a celebratory attraction, however the on-field umpire Richard Illingworth initially remained unmoved. New Zealand captain Tom Latham then referred to as for a assessment, and UltraEdge detected a faint noise because the ball handed Pant’s bat. Nevertheless, it was unclear whether or not this noise resulted from the ball contacting the bat or the bat hitting Pant’s pad.
The third umpire, Paul Reiffel, reviewed a number of angles and ultimately overturned the preliminary not-out choice, ruling Pant out. Regardless of his objections and visual disappointment, Pant needed to settle for the choice and depart from the sphere, concluding his innings on a excessive be aware with a brisk 64 off 57 balls, together with 9 fours and a six.
Additionally READ: “I totally take accountability of that as a captain and chief”: Rohit Sharma on India’s embarrassing Check sequence whitewash in opposition to New Zealand
AB de Villiers weighs in on controversial name
Following the sport, de Villiers took to X to specific his ideas on Pant’s dismissal, elevating considerations in regards to the decision-making course of and the reliability of UltraEdge expertise in such conditions.
“Controversy! Little gray space as soon as once more. Did Pant get bat on that or not? Drawback is when the ball passes the bat at precisely the identical time a batter hits his pad snicko will decide up the noise. However how positive are we he hit it? I’ve all the time frightened about this and right here it occurs at an enormous second in an enormous Check match. The place’s hotspot?!” de Villiers captioned on X.
Controversy! Little gray space as soon as once more. Did Pant get bat on that or not? Drawback is when the ball passes the bat at precisely the identical time a batter hits his pad snicko will decide up the noise. However how positive are we he hit it? I’ve all the time frightened about this and right here it occurs at a…
— AB de Villiers (@ABdeVilliers17) November 3, 2024
India falls wanting the goal
New Zealand set India a goal of 147 on this last Check, however India struggled of their chase. Regardless of Pant’s aggressive knock, the group was bowled out for 121, falling brief by 25 runs and conceding the sequence to New Zealand with a clear sweep of 3-0. Pant’s dismissal, occurring at a vital juncture, performed a big position within the match’s final result, with followers and specialists alike debating whether or not the choice was truthful.
Additionally WATCH: Ajaz Patel’s spin outfoxes Shubman Gill on Day 3 of the third Check | IND vs NZ
