A British Columbia provincial courtroom choose has dominated {that a} Boston Bar man who shot a tea-cup Chihuahua named Bear claiming it was menacing his chickens was not justified in killing the animal.
The courtroom mentioned in a ruling revealed on-line that Behrouz Rahmani Far had been in a bitter, years-long feud with the canine’s proprietor, his neighbour Glenn Kurack.
“By all accounts, the 2 don’t get alongside,” Choose Peter Whyte mentioned final month in Chilliwack provincial courtroom.
Kurack, the ruling mentioned, was below a courtroom order to not have any contact with Rahmani Far after being convicted of assault on the time of the trial.
The ruling mentioned the pair had made quite a few complaints to police about one another through the years, and a part of their dispute “centred” on Kurack’s canine.
Rahmani Far retains about 60 chickens and the tiny canine had roamed onto the person’s property a number of instances main as much as March 3, 2022, when Far used a .22 calibre rifle to shoot the male canine within the head, the ruling mentioned.
The ruling says Rahmani Far known as police and reported that he shot the canine to “deliver peace” to his life, and believed that B.C.’s Livestock Act allowed him to kill the animal as a result of it was “threatening his chickens.”
“He initially mentioned he didn’t kill Bear to guard his chickens, however fairly to guard his household,” the ruling says. “He mentioned he regretted having to take such a drastic measure, however felt he had no different alternative.”
The courtroom discovered the regulation does not apply to chickens, and that Bear wasn’t an “imminent danger,” because it convicted Rahmani Far of killing or injuring an animal.
Whyte mentioned the person shot Bear not due to the hazard to his household or chickens, however fairly his ongoing anger at his neighbour and frustration with police, who he mentioned weren’t fixing the issue.
“He had merely had sufficient, and decided that he would resolve the matter by taking it into his personal palms,” Whyte’s ruling mentioned. “He informed the RCMP that if a canine got here again on his property, he would shoot it. He expressed frustration at what he perceived was inaction on the a part of the RCMP to take care of his concern in regards to the canine.”
Whyte’s ruling mentioned Rahmani Far did not try to “scare or shoot the canine away” when he discovered it on his property the day of the taking pictures.
“This was as a result of, on the time he retrieved his rifle, he had made a ultimate choice to take care of the difficulty as soon as and for all,” Whyte mentioned. “In his personal phrases, he had ‘had sufficient.'”
Glenn Kurack mentioned in an interview on Tuesday that his relationship along with his neighbour soured shortly after they started dwelling subsequent to one another years in the past, with troubles over parking entry and a dispute over cost for electrical work that he had accomplished for Rahmani Far.
He mentioned he adopted Bear and one other Chihuahua after his ex-wife died, and she or he had paid about $6,000 for the breeding pair.
Kurack mentioned he purchased his property at an “superior time,” when costs had been extra reasonably priced, and the feud along with his neighbour has family and friends encouraging him to maneuver away.
“All people thinks I ought to simply promote my place and transfer. I personal my very own home. My home is the one home on the town that is photo voltaic powered,” he mentioned. “I can not transfer wherever else that is cheaper than the place I’m.”
Rahmani Far’s defence lawyer didn’t reply to a request for touch upon the case, and the Boston Bar RCMP detachment didn’t return a name for remark in regards to the ongoing feud.
This report by The Canadian Press was first revealed Oct. 8, 2024.
