The one head-to-head debate in California’s high-stakes U.S. Senate race between Rep. Adam B. Schiff and former Dodger Steve Garvey was dominated Tuesday by contentious exchanges on a number of nationwide political points — from immigration to the financial system, increasing battle within the Center East, reproductive healthcare and international warming.
The sharpest exchanges, nevertheless, associated to the 2 candidates’ vastly totally different stances on former President Trump.
Schiff, a Burbank Democrat with greater than 20 years of expertise within the Home and a commanding lead within the polls, forged Garvey as an inexperienced Trump backer who would push conservative reasonably than Californian values in Washington.
Californians, Schiff quipped, are “not searching for some MAGA mini-me in a baseball uniform.”
Garvey, a Palm Desert Republican with no political expertise however excessive title recognition from his days as a Main League Baseball star, recommended Schiff was too caught up in occasion politics and his vendetta towards Trump to concentrate on the problems most essential to California voters.
“How can you concentrate on one man day-after-day and concentrate on that while you’ve obtained tens of millions of individuals in California to handle?” Garvey mentioned. “I believe it’s unconscionable.”
The controversy was testy from the beginning. When Schiff in his first remarks accused Garvey of turning a blind eye to the worst impulses of Trump — who Schiff mentioned needs to “be a dictator on Day One” — Garvey replied, borrowing a well-known Ronald Reagan line utilized in a 1980 presidential debate, “There you go once more.”
Throughout a separate trade on immigration, wherein Schiff accused Garvey of supporting Trump’s plan for mass deportations, Garvey mentioned, “One of many two of us is sincere and easy.”
“I’d agree with that,” Schiff shot again.
The controversy provided a last probability for the 2 candidates to sq. off in public earlier than voters determine between them within the November election. Californians shall be requested to vote twice within the Senate race: First, to decide on Schiff or Garvey to serve out the rest of the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s last time period, which ends in early January, and, individually, who ought to serve a subsequent six-year Senate time period.
Tuesday’s debate was the primary since Garvey and Schiff gained the 2 highest totals of votes in a extra crowded major subject, wherein Schiff bested Democratic rivals Reps. Katie Porter of Irvine and Barbara Lee of Oakland. Polls present Schiff with a considerable lead over Garvey.
Trump loomed over immigration debate
Moderators of the fast-paced, hour-long debate — hosted by KABC-TV in partnership with Univision and the League of Girls Voters — requested Schiff and Garvey a number of questions on immigration and border safety.
Schiff mentioned the nation must “get management of the border” with extra personnel and expertise to interdict folks and medicines. However it additionally wants a “complete immigration coverage” that treats folks humanely and gives reduction for farmworkers and undocumented individuals who arrived within the U.S. as youngsters.
And he blasted Garvey for backing Trump, saying Trump’s plan is for mass deportations that can devastate the nation and immigrant communities.
“You’re voting for mass deportations while you say you’re for Donald Trump,” Schiff mentioned.
Garvey mentioned his marketing campaign has centered closely on Latino communities. He additionally mentioned border safety must be vastly enhanced. He mentioned Schiff, alongside President Biden, had created an “existential disaster” by backing an “open border.”
“What we now have to do is safe the border. Now we have to complete off the wall. Now we have to reinstate ‘stay in Mexico,’” Garvey mentioned. “Now we have to strengthen our border patrol. Now we have to get again to constructing amenities on the border that can detain these unlawful immigrants, then a judicial system that can will strive them.”
A file variety of folks have been stopped on the U.S.-Mexico border through the Biden-Harris administration, and Republicans throughout the nation — together with Garvey — are pushing to make border safety a marketing campaign legal responsibility for Democrats.
“Plenty of Individuals are involved about immigration,” mentioned Mindy Romero, the founding father of the Middle for Inclusive Democracy at USC. “The rationale why Republicans are speaking about it a lot is as a result of it really works.”
Whereas Garvey’s possibilities of profitable the Senate race are low given how deeply blue California voters are total, Romero mentioned, he’s nonetheless the highest-ranking Republican on the poll after Trump — and what Garvey says about immigration may nonetheless matter for Republicans.
“In California, we’re not a monolith and we’re not all in sync on this concern,” Romero mentioned. “What Garvey says and does may assist encourage and mobilize Republicans.”
Garvey struggled to state a transparent place on abortion
The moderators sought, with out success, to deliver readability to Garvey’s place on abortion rights.
He has mentioned that he personally opposes abortion and wouldn’t assist a federal ban on abortion.
“I’m a Catholic,” Garvey mentioned Tuesday evening. “I imagine in life at conception. I imagine that God breathes a soul into these fetuses. So I’m steadfast by way of my insurance policies on abortion, and likewise pledge to assist all of the folks of California.”
However Garvey additionally pledged to “assist the voice of Californians.” He mentioned he supported the modification enshrining a proper to abortion within the state Structure that two-thirds of Golden State voters supported in 2022 after the Supreme Courtroom overturned Roe v. Wade.
If Garvey is “listening to the voices of Californians like he claims, he would hear their voices loud and clear,” Schiff mentioned. “Californians desire a nationwide proper to reproductive freedom they usually don’t need the federal government within the enterprise of creating that call for girls.”
Schiff has been a longtime vocal advocate for entry to abortion companies, and mentioned Tuesday that he helps establishing a nationwide proper to abortion entry.
A UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Research ballot in early August, co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Instances, discovered that greater than half of probably California voters surveyed — 52% — mentioned electing somebody who “can be a robust voice in defending abortion rights within the Senate” was essential to them.
Variations on authorities’s function on the financial system
The variations in how Schiff and Garvey see the function of presidency was absolutely on show after they had been pressed on the best way to tackle the rising value of products and housing.
“We’re a lot worse off than we had been 4 years in the past,” Garvey mentioned. He mentioned he supported extra free-market insurance policies, and knocked Schiff for what he described as “Schiff-flation.”
Housing is a neighborhood concern and extra federal regulation may result in the federal government being “overinvolved,” Garvey mentioned.
Requested how he would assist renters, he mentioned he’d accomplish that by getting the U.S. financial system “roaring once more.”
Schiff mentioned he would assist extra direct federal spending on housing, and in addition to an growth of Part 8 vouchers, a authorities subsidy that permits eligible tenants to seek out housing with non-public landlords. He additionally proposed a “renter’s tax credit score,” akin to the tax deduction that permits householders to put in writing off their mortgage curiosity funds.
Garvey mentioned he would assist tariffs on imported items shipped by “an organization that threatens the success of an American firm.” However, he mentioned, he would like to see decrease home taxes to foster extra small companies and cut back the necessity to import international items.
Schiff mentioned he doesn’t assist Trump’s “across-the-board tariffs,” which he mentioned would result in greater costs for customers. He mentioned he would assist “focused tariffs” when China dumps low cost items into the nation “to attempt to drive American companies out of enterprise.”
Feinstein’s legacy stirs debate
All through the controversy, the political specter of the girl whose seat Schiff and Garvey are vying for loomed giant.
Proper out of the gate, KABC anchor and moderator Marc Brown introduced up Feinstein having authored an assault weapons ban in 1994, and requested Garvey whether or not he would take any motion on weapons had been he elected.
“I imagine within the Structure, I imagine within the Second Modification. I imagine it can by no means be overturned, nor ought to we try to overturn that,” Garvey mentioned. “I do have sympathy for all of those that might have been victims of shootings, however I believe that an important factor is a stringent background verify that goes a lot deeper than it’s at this time, as a way to to protect the integrity of the Second Modification and to have the ability to present for folks to defend themselves.”
Schiff mentioned Californians want leaders like Feinstein who’re prepared to “stand as much as” the Nationwide Rifle Assn.
“I’d assist an assault weapons ban. I’d assist prolonged and common background checks. I’d assist a ban on prolonged ammunition clips and my very own invoice, which might strip away the NRA’s immunity from legal responsibility,” Schiff mentioned. “Mr. Garvey was requested only a couple weeks in the past if he would assist any gun management measure, and his reply was unequivocal, no, that isn’t what Californians are searching for. Californians desire a chief like Dianne Feinstein, who will stand as much as the NRA.”
Later within the debate, Feinstein got here up once more, on the difficulty of environmental rules — and whether or not Schiff would ease water restrictions on farmers.
Schiff mentioned he wouldn’t “assist eviscerating” rules, however would do what Sen. Feinstein did, which is “search for these alternatives the place we are able to have a win, each for our farms, our cities and the environment.”
Garvey mentioned environmentalists within the state have to work with farmers, and that he’s a “consensus builder” who might help make that occur. He referred to as water the “platinum concern in California,” and one Schiff doesn’t know the best way to repair.
Schiff would later evoke Feinstein’s title on the financial system, saying he realizes many in California are struggling financially and that he’ll work with “group leaders and stakeholders in each a part of this Golden State” in “Feinstein’s mannequin.”
“Mr. Schiff, you’re no Dianne Feinstein,” Garvey mentioned. “I keep in mind when this state was the heartbeat of America, and now it’s only a murmur.”
Schiff, in response, mentioned Feinstein was a good friend of his, and would by no means “faux to be the equal” of hers, as a result of she was a “big.” However he recommended he’s way more just like Feinstein than Garvey.
“Whereas Mr. Garvey was signing baseballs for the final 37 years, I used to be seeing presidents of each events and governors of each events signal my payments into legislation,” Schiff mentioned.
Again to Trump
After the controversy, in small gaggles with reporters, each Schiff and Garvey got here again to a different politician not within the room: Trump.
Schiff mentioned it was clear from the controversy that Garvey is “for Trump” and his agenda.
“He’s for states with the ability to ban abortion. He’s towards any type of gun security laws. He’s for opening up the oil spigots. These are views proper out of Venture 2025 and Trump, however they don’t seem to be in sync in California,” Schiff mentioned.
Garvey mentioned he felt he had been unfairly tied to Trump.
“Folks know that we’re two solely totally different folks,” he mentioned.
He mentioned Schiff’s try to “paint me far-right” wouldn’t get up, as a result of “folks know I’m conservatively average.”
Garvey declined to say whether or not he would vote for Trump in November, however confirmed that he voted for Trump for a 3rd time on this yr’s major.