Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance nonetheless doesn’t wish to speak about Donald Trump’s baseless claims that he was the true winner of the 2020 presidential election.
In a video clip launched Friday from an upcoming podcast episode with The New York Instances’ Lulu Garcia-Navarro, Vance refused 5 instances to say whether or not he backs Trump’s conspiracy idea about that yr’s vote, despite the fact that the previous Republican president continues to espouse the declare as he campaigns to retake the White Home.
The primary time Garcia-Navarro requested Vance, he mentioned he wished to maneuver ahead from the problem ― a go-to line for him currently.
“Donald Trump and I’ve each raised a variety of points with the 2020 election, however we’re targeted on the longer term. I believe there’s an obsession right here with specializing in 2020. I’m way more apprehensive about what occurred after 2020,” he mentioned, continuing to checklist off marketing campaign speaking factors.
Garcia-Navarro requested Vance the identical query a second, third and fourth time. Vance responded in quite a lot of methods however by no means answered the query instantly. At one level, he tried to pivot the dialog to President Joe Biden’s son and his laptop computer. At one other, he claimed that expertise firms acted to “censor a narrative that unbiased research have urged would have price Trump thousands and thousands of votes.”
The fifth time Garcia-Navarro prompted Vance to reply, she bought visibly annoyed with him.
“I’ve requested this query repeatedly,” she reminded him. “It’s one thing that is essential for the American folks to know. There isn’t any proof, authorized or in any other case, that Donald Trump didn’t lose the 2020 election.”
Vance then accused her of “repeating a slogan fairly than partaking with what I’m saying,” and urged he doesn’t care that a number of courts dominated in opposition to Trump’s election claims.
“I’m apprehensive about Individuals who really feel like there have been issues in 2020,” he mentioned. “I’m not apprehensive in regards to the slogan that folks throw: ‘Properly, each courtroom case went this fashion.’”
Finally, he mentioned that he would have voted in opposition to certifying the outcomes of the final presidential election.
The total episode of Garcia-Navarro’s podcast, “The Interview,” is scheduled for launch Saturday.