Lately, I used to be doomscrolling Twitter, studying the Republican-aligned election polls Elon Musk forces into my feed in an effort to make me die from alcohol poisoning. I made a decision to precise my rage (which is the one factor Twitter is nice for anymore) on the silent enemy of democracy on this and each election: the Electoral School.
As you possibly can see, the factor has 3.8 million views (to date) and generated 13,000 feedback. Most individuals (in my bubble of people that have self-selected to search out my tweets) agreed with me, however a bunch of MAGAs discovered my tweet and used their political science levels from Issues Folks Are Saying College to precise their assist for the Electoral School.
I wasn’t terribly stunned that they got here after me—I’m used to Republicans who pay for Twitter disagreeing with pro-democracy messages; what struck me was how unhealthy their arguments have been. They intuited that the Electoral School is a vital cog of their white supremacist machine, however their protection of it was borderline nonsensical. Based mostly on their responses, it’s not fully clear to me that the individuals who defend the Electoral School the loudest have any concept the way it works—or what it helps apart from Donald Trump’s probabilities of turning into president once more.
I wish to reply to those folks and proper the report on what the Electoral School does, however I can’t reply to 13,000 feedback, and the individuals who want to listen to it most are sometimes proof against studying and studying. However, I believe it’s vital to not let Republicans utterly management the narrative about what this factor does.
What follows is quite a lot of tweets I’ve screen-grabbed which might be exemplary of the MAGA protection of the Electoral School. Set off warning: You might be about to see how Republicans actually assume.
Some model of this argument was, by far, the commonest protection of the Electoral School. For that I believe we are able to blame Utah Senator Mike Lee, who’s fond of claiming, “We reside in a republic, not a democracy,” as if he and Nic Cage are the one individuals who have appeared on the Structure underneath a black mild. Lee often trots out this line to justify any antidemocratic factor he or his social gathering is as much as in the mean time, and this woman and/or Russian counterintelligence officer is dutifully utilizing the speaking level for a similar impact.
It’s a basic instance of individuals mouthing phrases they don’t totally perceive, the identical approach Danny DeVito voiced The Lorax in a bunch of various languages he doesn’t really communicate merely by studying his traces phonetically. Fortunately for me, the neighborhood faculty I went to was in Boston (properly, not in Boston, however close to Boston), and along with learning American historical past and civics I additionally studied political philosophy, so I can clarify the distinction.
The core of the argument—that the USA is just not a democracy however a republic—is just not fallacious; it simply has nothing to do with the Electoral School. Being a republic is just not a justification for our republic to work anti-democratically. So let’s outline some phrases: In a “direct democracy,” the folks vote for his or her legal guidelines. Each regulation. On a regular basis. We’ve some features of direct democracy at the moment (voter referendums are an instance of direct democracy), as do quite a lot of different nations. The newest instance of direct democracy being utilized within the trendy context is, most likely, Brexit, however you see how that labored out for them. For essentially the most half, direct democracies have confirmed unworkable all through historical past as a result of legal guidelines are difficult, and individuals are busy and largely uninformed.
We, fully clearly, don’t reside in a direct democracy (a system of presidency which is practiced by precisely zero international locations at the moment). As an alternative, sure, we reside in a republic. In a republic, representatives of the folks vote for the legal guidelines that govern the land. How these representatives are chosen differs relying on the republic, however in the USA now we have gone with a “democratic republic,” which signifies that the folks (versus a king, or a checking account, or an accident of delivery) select the representatives who, in flip, select the legal guidelines. You’ll be able to, as this woman does, precisely say we reside in a “constitutional” republic, however that modifier doesn’t do a lot sensible work. “Constitutional” simply signifies that the powers of our authorities are written down, and restricted to what’s been written down, however one might simply as simply write down a “constitutional monarchy” and even the “constitutional dictatorship” Donald Trump and his Supreme Court docket appear to need. The democratic selection of our republican representatives is what made our system distinctive, at its founding.
The query of who counts as “the folks” empowered to decide on their constitutional representatives has been a way of some debate all through the historical past of republics, however, as of the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act (and never one second earlier than), the US lastly determined to be a democratic republic primarily based on common suffrage for grownup residents. At the very least on paper, all grownup residents have the franchise and thus the flexibility to decide on their representatives. That is what political philosophers name “self-government.”
Now that everyone understands the essential phrases, we are able to see the place our good friend goes astray: Removed from being a trademark of a democratic republic, the Electoral School is without doubt one of the key elements of our constitutional system that doesn’t comply with the rules of democratic republicanism primarily based on common suffrage and self-government. As an alternative of voting for the president, we vote for “slates of electors” who’re obligated to vote for a specific candidate. The variety of electors within the slate is predicated on the state by which we vote and, due to the best way the variety of electors is apportioned, violates the precept of 1 individual, one vote. That signifies that the one elected official who is meant to signify all of the American folks—the president of the USA—is just not chosen by a vote of all the American folks. It makes the president of our democratic republic the one official who is just not a democratically chosen republican consultant.
In fact, the individuals who got here up with the Electoral School weren’t as excited by forming a democratic republic as they have been in forming a Western slave empire that might final for perpetuity. Certainly, the nation’s founders additionally rejected the rules of democratic republican authorities when it got here to the US Senate. Initially, senators weren’t chosen by a well-liked vote however by the legislatures from every state. That wasn’t modified till 1913, with the ratification of the seventeenth Modification to the Structure.
In a “constitutional republic” we might change to a well-liked vote for the president simply as simply as we switched to a well-liked vote for the Senate, just by ratifying one other modification. However we haven’t. So let’s get to why the Electoral School is right here within the first place, and why Trump cultists wrongly assume it nonetheless holds worth at the moment.
Argument 2
The concept that the Electoral School protects small states and rural voters is the most important trendy lie about what the system does. The EC doesn’t power politicians to provide a rattling about whether or not or not a state is “rural”; it forces them to care about whether or not the margin of victory is shut sufficient within the state to make it worthwhile to marketing campaign there.
Fashionable
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
We are able to clearly see this by taking a look at the place the presidential candidates are spending their cash and marketing campaign time. An NPR evaluation from Might confirmed that the 2 presidential candidates have been spending most of their cash in only a few states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. All of these rank within the prime 15 states, by inhabitants, apart from Wisconsin, which is twentieth (which means it’s nonetheless within the prime half of states by inhabitants). The Electoral School doesn’t direct candidates’ marketing campaign time and a spotlight to small states however to massive states the place the race occurs to be tight.
And that doesn’t even inform the total story by way of the true urban-rural divide. Initially, the concept of a “rural” state is basically a delusion. In line with the 2020 Census, 80 p.c of People reside in “city” areas. In solely 4 states—Maine, Mississippi, Vermont, and West Virginia—does a majority of the inhabitants reside outdoors of city areas, and no one with a straight face would argue that the Electoral School encourages presidential candidates to spend so much of time and sources in these locations.
Of the states which might be Electoral School “battlegrounds,” Wisconsin and North Carolina are the one ones the place as a lot as a 3rd of their populations reside in rural areas. In all the opposite battleground states, greater than 70 p.c of the inhabitants lives in city areas.
We’re an urbanized nation. That’s why, even when politicians go to barely extra rural states like Georgia or Michigan, they go to the foremost cities in these states. They go to the place folks really reside. Main cities, in comparatively populous states, have an outsize share of political energy within the Electoral School system so long as these states are shut.
So what’s actually occurring right here? Why achieve this many individuals consider the Electoral School protects “rural” pursuits when it demonstrably doesn’t? I consider what’s taking place is that these individuals are utilizing “rural” as a euphemism for “white,” and “city” as a euphemism for “Black.” The Electoral School protects white pursuits and sensibilities from being overrun by the rising non-white majority on this nation, and the individuals who defend the EC are determined to maintain it that approach. The “mob rule” these folks declare to be afraid of is just not, say, mobs of indignant whites attacking the Capitol to put in the federal government of the dropping presidential candidate; they’re anxious about “mobs” of Black folks, dwelling in cities, voting for the candidate of their selection, and having their votes rely simply as a lot as these of white of us who’re unfold out across the nation.
The factor is, the Electoral School protects these white pursuits solely due to one other of its important options that we haven’t talked about—which brings us to the subsequent horrible argument in its protection.
Argument 3
In 2020, the state the place Donald Trump acquired essentially the most votes was… California. He successfully didn’t marketing campaign there, however he nonetheless garnered extra uncooked widespread votes there than wherever else. But none of these votes mattered, as a result of the Electoral School is a winner-take-all system.
Essentially the most insidious approach the Electoral School warps our political course of is that, in virtually all instances, it awards the total slate of electors to whichever candidate wins a state, even when the margin of victory is just one vote. That functionally disenfranchises complete coalitions of voters, rendering their votes meaningless in the event that they occur to reside in a state that’s prone to go the opposite approach. Republicans in California have virtually no presidential political energy, though there are extra Republicans in California than wherever else, whereas Democrats in Texas or (latterly) Florida could as properly not exist for the needs of the presidential election.
In the event you really care about “rural” voters and their pursuits (and never simply white ones) it’s best to hate the Electoral School. In a winner-take-all system, the votes of rural communities will virtually at all times be dwarfed by these of voters packed into cities. In a nationwide widespread vote, rural voters would possibly be capable of type coalitions throughout state traces that might transfer the needle and couldn’t be ignored by major-party candidates. Within the Electoral School system, you possibly can functionally ignore rural voters if you may get sufficient votes out of Atlanta, Milwaukee, or Philadelphia to win a full slate of Electoral School votes.
This Electoral School impact reverberates outdoors of the election course of, because it provides perverse incentives to whoever wins the presidential election when they’re governing. A Republican president can (as Donald Trump did) deal with two of the 4 most populous states within the nation (California and New York) as non-factors, directing federal sources away from the locations they’re unlikely to win. A Democratic president might do the identical to the opposite two most populous states, Texas and Florida, when they’re in cost. Once more, in our system, the president is the one one who is meant to signify all the folks, however the Electoral School tells the president to disregard complete states the place their social gathering is unlikely to get 50 percent-plus-one votes.
A few individuals who made the argument that the EC protects the remainder of the nation from California and New York shared a map produced by Nationwide Evaluation columnist Dan McLaughlin purporting to point out that underneath a nationwide widespread vote a candidate who gained California and New York 75 to fifteen however misplaced each different state 54 to 46 would nonetheless win the presidency. (I’ve not reproduced the map right here as a result of I believe he was pulling numbers out of his ass and my folks didn’t survive the Center Passage and the Reagan administration so I may very well be round to fact-check Dan’s cocktail napkins.) However right here’s the factor: Are you able to think about how world-historically terrible a significant social gathering presidential candidate must be to lose California and New York by 60 factors? Trump, of all folks, misplaced California by solely 29 p.c final time (he acquired 34.4 p.c of the vote to Biden’s 63.5). He misplaced his house state of New York by 23 p.c (he acquired 38 p.c of the vote to Biden’s 61 p.c).
Furthermore, the concept that somebody would win New York by 60 freaking factors… however lose New Jersey and Connecticut and in all places else moreover California… is laughable on its face. The Yankees wouldn’t win the favored vote in New York by 60 factors, however then lose Connecticut to the Mets.
The concept that a nationwide widespread vote system would result in candidates’ campaigning in California and New York and nowhere else is just not an argument that may face up to its first contact with actuality, which is why the individuals who peddle it should invent fantasies. The concept that California and New York would “management” America in a well-liked vote system is fallacious as a matter of primary arithmetic. If all people’s vote counted equally, all people’s vote would matter equally.
This isn’t to say that eradicating the Electoral School would have no impact on campaigns for president. It will. However that simply results in our subsequent argument.
Argument 4
Sure. YES. Thanks for making my argument for me. If the election have been decided by the favored vote, candidates, together with Donald Trump, would run a marketing campaign designed to get essentially the most votes.
Who thinks that’s a nasty factor? Wouldn’t folks like to see a marketing campaign designed to “maximize votes” as a substitute of a marketing campaign designed to… denigrate non-white populations dwelling in states the place the Electoral School winner is already predetermined? I, for one, could be very excited by what the Republican candidate for president would say in the event that they have been really making an attempt to win essentially the most votes as a substitute of scare a marginal variety of white of us in Wisconsin. I can’t say for positive, however I wager their key marketing campaign platforms wouldn’t be “immigrants are consuming your canine” and “rape victims needs to be pressured to bear their assailants’ kids.”
Anyway, now that this man agrees, let’s knock the final ones out, speedy hearth.
Generalized Gobbledygook
We haven’t had the similar guidelines for 200 years. The entire level of being a constitutional republic is that we are able to change the foundations—the Structure—which now we have, 27 instances to date (together with the important seventeenth Modification I discussed earlier). And fascists don’t change the foundations after they don’t get their approach. Fascists present up on the Capitol and attempt to hold folks after they don’t get their approach.
To paraphrase Luke Skywalker: Each phrase of that tweet is fallacious. First, the Electoral School is actually the mechanism that treats us as 50 international locations as a substitute of 1. Second, the federal authorities already imposes its values on the states, and that basically solely appears to piss off the states when the federal authorities “values” not letting white folks personal different folks. Third, and most vital, Richard Rogers (born in New York Metropolis) and Oscar Hammerstein (ditto), are the individuals who created what you consider as Oklahoma’s values.
The Electoral School doesn’t give all states an equal say. Larger states have extra of a say within the Electoral School. It’s the Senate that offers each state an equal say. The Senate needs to be abolished, however that’s a special article.
You’re purported to capitalize the ‘B’ in “Black,” as within the sentence, “The Black woman grew to become the Democratic Occasion nominee for president when she gained the votes of a majority of delegates on the Democratic Nationwide Conference.”
So Now What?
It will take a constitutional modification to eliminate the Electoral School. Amendments have to be ratified by three-fourths of the states, and so an modification abolishing the Electoral School is unlikely to occur so long as voters in small states falsely consider the system provides them extra political energy than they might have in any other case.
That’s why it’s so vital to push again on the false narratives which might be being unfold about how the Electoral School features. It doesn’t give voters from small states extra of a voice. As an alternative, it solely provides voters from comparatively massive states an inflated voice if their state occurs to have simply sufficient voters from each events at any explicit political second. On this election cycle, the Electoral School favors Pennsylvania and Georgia. Only a few cycles in the past, these battlegrounds have been Florida and Ohio. Sooner or later, the battlegrounds is perhaps Texas or California. The Electoral School is agnostic as to which states have the facility; it simply requires that the folks themselves are handled unfairly and unequally.
The Electoral School is a horrible approach to decide on a frontrunner in a democracy. Or a republic. It’s horrible exactly as a result of it takes the selection away from folks and offers it to the land the folks occur to be dwelling on after they attempt to vote. It’s a system that was designed to guard slavery and nonetheless features to guard white folks from having to interact with a browning nation. It’s working precisely prefer it was meant, and that’s its largest drawback.
Sadly, will probably be with us so long as Republicans rightly understand that it’s the solely approach for them to win energy for his or her demonstrably unpopular agenda.
However there will probably be a second, sometime sooner or later, when the political calculation will flip. A Democrat will faucet into the still-unrealized political energy of Black of us dwelling in former Accomplice states and win slim victories in not simply Georgia however locations like Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. White of us in Wisconsin and Minnesota will strenuously object, however it gained’t matter due to the Electoral School. As quickly as a Democrat loses the favored vote however wins an Electoral School victory due to the assist of Black and brown folks in presently pink states, Republican white of us will instantly turn out to be very excited by eliminating the Electoral School.
Democrats should seize that second, when it comes. Eliminating a vestige of slavery will at all times profit non-white folks in the long term, even when it means sacrificing a short lived political benefit.
I’ll doubtless be lifeless by the point that second arrives, so I take into account this my preemptive reminder to future generations: The Electoral School is silly and have to be abolished.
Can we rely on you?
Within the coming election, the destiny of our democracy and elementary civil rights are on the poll. The conservative architects of Mission 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian imaginative and prescient throughout all ranges of presidency if he ought to win.
We’ve already seen occasions that fill us with each dread and cautious optimism—all through all of it, The Nation has been a bulwark in opposition to misinformation and an advocate for daring, principled views. Our devoted writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.
Tales like these and the one you simply learn are important at this important juncture in our nation’s historical past. Now greater than ever, we’d like clear-eyed and deeply reported impartial journalism to make sense of the headlines and type reality from fiction. Donate at the moment and be part of our 160-year legacy of talking reality to energy and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.
All through 2024 and what’s doubtless the defining election of our lifetimes, we’d like your assist to proceed publishing the insightful journalism you depend on.
Thanks,
The Editors of The Nation
Extra from The Nation
A brand new examine exhibits that states dominated by conservatives have markedly worse well being outcomes.
Gregg Gonsalves
Each events are competing to see who can hold propping up the identical previous failed myths about immigration.
Vicki B. Gaubeca
He relished the limelight in 2016 and 2020. Now he’s refusing to debate and ducking interviews.
John Nichols
The previous president, who turned 100 on October 1, and is in hospice care, stated he’s “solely making an attempt to make it to vote for Kamala Harris,” in line with his grandson, Jason Carter.
OppArt
/
Colleen Quinn
This 12 months’s Pray Vote Stand summit revealed fissures round Trump’s refusal to assist a nationwide abortion ban.
Amy Littlefield
Democrat or Republican, the subsequent presidency will nonetheless imply dying for others in faraway locations.
Ahmed Moor
