Are canine individuals extra resilient than cat individuals? Apparently so

Cat or canine particular person?

Leah Michelle Baines and Jessica Lee Oliva at James Cook dinner College in Australia say they’ve found that individuals who personal canine are typically extra resilient than those that personal cats. Additionally they report discovering that individuals who personal cats are typically extra neurotic than those that personal canine.

Writing in Anthrozoös, they are saying: “In distinction to our expectations, no different character variations have been discovered between pet homeowners…Findings counsel that character components may clarify why individuals who select to personal canine fare higher than individuals who select to not personal canine throughout difficult occasions of social isolation, which can be unrelated to the animal itself.”

Sizing up satisfaction

A lot of science will depend on the query “how can I measure this factor (no matter this factor is) precisely, exactly and reliably sufficient to achieve perception about it”. That query nearly screams – possibly in ecstasy, possibly in agony, possibly in puzzlement – from a analysis paper that reader Nicolas Clairis delivered to Suggestions’s consideration.

“Do intercourse toys make me glad? Using intercourse toys in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, France, and the UK” was revealed by Gert Martin Hald, Silvia Pavan and Camilla S. Øverup in The Journal of Intercourse Analysis.

How, Suggestions has stayed up nights questioning, might one measure that type of satisfaction in somebody apart from oneself? Measure it in a means that might make one really feel assured that the reply is correct and true?

Apparently unafraid of the issue, Hald, Pavan and Øverup went at it. They went at it greater than a thousandfold. Greater than 10 occasions a thousandfold. They sought measurements of a kind from “11,944 respondents from six European international locations”.

Suggestions hesitates to enter element right here about how the staff received and interpreted the 11,944 solutions. If the temptation is an excessive amount of for you to withstand, go learn the paper. Inform us whether or not you discover its climactic conclusion to be satisfying.

Espresso controversy

Nothing will get kidneys pumping fairly the way in which espresso does — and nothing will get the hearts and minds of kidney researchers pumping fairly the way in which the kidneys/espresso query does. Kidney Worldwide Stories generally treats its readers to boluses of opinion and reality about this, from researchers who appear emotionally primed and pumped.

A two-part query drives this motion: precisely how, and precisely how a lot, does espresso get kidneys pumping? A back-and-forth between two teams of US researchers started with the publication of “Espresso consumption could mitigate the danger for acute kidney damage“. Its authors say that “increased espresso consumption was related to a decrease threat” of kidney issues.

The staff checked out knowledge collected throughout a three-year span, during which 15,792 middle-aged individuals indicated what number of cups of espresso they thought they’d swallowed in the course of the earlier yr – thus, 15,792 self-educated guesses. The examine compares these guessed coffee-cup tallies with every particular person’s report, in later life, of what it calls “acute kidney damage occasions”, or AKIs.

A second group responded by pumping out a letter referred to as “The lacking hyperlink between espresso consumption and AKI-water“. The drinks, or the failure to drink, can have overwhelming results on the kidneys, the researchers counsel. Additionally they counsel that the primary group could not have totally thought-about that.

The primary group disagreed, and pumped again a well-maybe-but-Killer response, citing a examine about espresso and dehydration. That British examine’s lead writer: Sophie Killer.

Onward forth, and onward again, sloshes the dialogue. Extra lately, a 3rd group primarily based in China, South Korea and the Czech Republic introduced the stream of opinion once more into its conventional middle-ground muddle. “In abstract,” says the staff’s report, “a number of contradictory results of caffeine consumption on kidney operate have been reported”.

Espresso to stop covid-19

Espresso-drinking can have nearly any desired medical impact on an individual, to some extent. In some circumstances, that diploma is zero. In different circumstances, it’s not.

Chen-Shiou Wu at China Medical College in Taiwan and colleagues ran experiments that led them to publish a examine referred to as “Espresso as a dietary technique to stop SARS-CoV-2 an infection“.

Their first experiment requested if espresso might impede the SARS-CoV-2 virus from infecting human embryonic kidney cells nurtured in a lab. Then they drew and did experiments on blood from 64 espresso drinkers. The cell work and the drinker work, mixed, led to some optimistic ideas.

The staff studies that the perfect timeline for espresso to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 an infection is inside 6 hours. “Taken collectively,” they are saying, “consuming 1–2 cups of espresso [or even] decaffeinated espresso each day can potently scale back SARS-CoV-2 an infection together with wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants.” These likelihoods “can function a suggestion for dietary well being throughout coexistence with SARS-CoV-2”.

At most, this might be the efficient, easy therapy that everybody has been looking for. A minimum of, espresso is as efficacious in opposition to covid-19 as it’s in opposition to most different illnesses.

Marc Abrahams created the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony and co-founded the journal Annals of Inconceivable Analysis. Earlier, he labored on uncommon methods to make use of computer systems. His web site is inconceivable.com

Obtained a narrative for Suggestions?

You possibly can ship tales to Suggestions by e-mail at suggestions@newscientist.com. Please embody your own home handle. This week’s and previous Feedbacks may be seen on our web site.