Editor’s notice: Grist is internet hosting a free digital occasion on January 9, 2025, at 2 pm EST / 11 am PST to research the progress and challenges seen on the U.N. local weather convention generally known as COP29. Be a part of Grist’s Jake Bittle in dialog with attendees and consultants about the place international local weather negotiations go from right here. Register right here.
After a painstaking impasse lasting practically every week, the annual United Nations local weather convention appeared to veer off track on Thursday. New negotiating texts had been launched within the morning, simply as a rancid odor from what appeared to be a sewage leak unfold all through a central space of the convention venue in Baku, Azerbaijan.
These half-dozen templates incensed nations as disparate as Zambia and New Zealand. Negotiators from each the developed and growing world argued that the Azerbaijani officers main the convention, which is named COP29, hadn’t carried out sufficient to push ahead an bold deal that will construct upon the so-called UAE consensus — a deal brokered finally yr’s COP28 in Dubai, during which the practically 200 nations of the world lastly agreed to “transition away” from fossil fuels and speed up decarbonization inside the subsequent 10 years. As of now, this yr’s tentative settlement incorporates nearly not one of the COP29 proposals, like these ventured by European nations and small island states within the Pacific, that will advance this ambition.
In truth, the brand new textual content launched on Thursday didn’t even point out the landmark COP28 settlement — and even affirm the world’s dedication to a clear power transition in any respect. It additionally omitted final yr’s guarantees to triple renewable power deployment and double power effectivity. Proposals to section out coal and fossil gasoline subsidies, which many climate-ambitious nations like Germany had pushed, had been nowhere to be discovered, both.
“That is truly getting into the other way,” stated Wopke Hoekstra, the European Union local weather commissioner, in a gaggle with reporters. “That isn’t acceptable. We can not settle for the view that apparently for some, the earlier COP didn’t occur.”
With only a day to go till the summit closes, climate-ambitious ministers from world wide have begun to blast the Azerbaijani convention presidency for what they are saying is a slide backwards on the all-important situation of ditching fossil fuels. In U.N. parlance, the “presidency” is a impartial occasion made up of political operatives and ministers from the nation internet hosting a given yr’s local weather talks. Though they hail from the host nation, they co-administer COP together with the forms of the United Nations, they usually aren’t supposed to place their thumb on the dimensions for their very own authorities’s pursuits — or anybody else’s.
Even so, presidencies have immense management over the negotiating course of, which inevitably offers them the facility to steer the method to their desired ends — particularly when talks break down early. This grew to become clear final yr when the United Arab Emirates, which hosted COP28 in Dubai, intervened to push by means of a deal to transition away from fossil fuels over the objections of many different oil-producing nations.
There was a way of deja vu in Azerbaijan, a rustic the place oil makes up an excellent bigger share of financial output, and the place attendees can see oil refineries from the home windows of shuttle buses that ferry them to the convention. Even earlier than the convention started, a watchdog group caught a senior Azerbaijani official on video suggesting he would use COP29 to facilitate offers for the nation’s state-owned oil firm. On the second day of the summit, Azerbaijan’s president, Ilham Aliyev, known as fossil fuels a “reward from God.”
Negotiators’ fears that the COP presidency would tip the scales grew stronger when Saudi Arabia, which produces round 12 % of the world’s crude oil, started to throw diplomatic wrenches in nearly each negotiation area final week. Officers from the oil-rich kingdom delayed and disputed agenda objects even in talks that had nothing to do with fossil fuels, forcing dialogue of untenable language and refusing to attend conferences the place their presence was obligatory for talks to progress.
On the finish of the primary week, the Saudis appeared to have gotten their approach. Not solely was the draft textual content on international decarbonization in depressing form, however negotiators couldn’t even agree about the place to position it on the agenda — a dispute akin to arguing over the place to park on the grocery retailer earlier than you even go in and begin procuring. The dummy textual content even included a menacing caveat: ”Events have strongly diverging views on whether or not or not the next textual components ought to be mentioned.”
The 60,000-odd individuals at COP waited days as ministers and heads of state consulted with one another and the Azerbaijani presidency in closed-door conferences. With greater than every week of negotiations within the rearview, it fell to Babayev and his deputies to type out a large number of diverging positions. Most nation leaders who spoke on the convention on Thursday stated he has to this point failed to do this.
Picture by Dominika Zarzycka / SOPA Pictures/LightRocket by way of Getty Pictures
“I feel there’s a divide,” stated Eamon Ryan, the surroundings minister for Eire, in a gaggle with reporters early Thursday. He accused the latest U.N. proposal on mitigation — the time period of artwork for the U.N.’s decarbonization agenda — of “sticking simply to the established order for vested pursuits within the present fossil gasoline system.”
It’s not simply main oil producers who could oppose a extra bold mitigation proposal: A number of nations within the massive G77 group of growing nations have been cautious of endorsing a doc with a firmer dedication to the power transition and not using a complementary dedication from the world’s high-emitting, rich nations to assist pay for it.
Harjeet Singh, the worldwide director of the Fossil Gasoline Treaty Initiative, a corporation advocating for the worldwide phaseout of oil and fuel, stated the growing nations’ opposition to a choice that restates final yr’s UAE consensus is an try to push for extra funding from the developed world. These nations don’t wish to re-endorse the power transition determination from final yr and not using a clear sign they’ll get cash to assist transfer away from oil and fuel and construct out renewable power.
“It’s a sequencing drawback,” he stated. “We wished [in Dubai] to triple renewable power and double power effectivity. Who will present finance for that?”
There’s additionally some proof that the presidency has given house to the pursuits of main fossil gasoline producers on the sidelines of the convention. Negotiators from a number of nations, who spoke to Grist on the situation of anonymity because of the sensitivity of ongoing negotiations, have decried the presidency’s last-minute appointment of a brand new chief to an official discussion board on the unfavourable impacts of decarbonization efforts. The three negotiators who spoke to Grist have accused the presidency of creating this determination on behalf of Saudi Arabia, regardless of widespread objections.
This alleged intervention got here throughout negotiations over a little-noticed agenda merchandise titled “Impression of implementation of response measures.” This unassuming merchandise, which has been on COP agendas for many years, is a key discussion board for oil-producing nations. That’s as a result of “response measures” refers to insurance policies that mitigate carbon emissions and local weather change, and the discussion board is a chance to focus on the hostile results of climate-friendly insurance policies.
Saudi Arabia and different oil-producing nations have historically used the Response Measures group as a chance to decry the harms that extra climate-ambitious nations are inflicting them, in accordance with negotiators who’ve held senior roles in response measures discussions. The discussion board’s principal activity this yr was to agree on the matters it ought to talk about over the subsequent 5 years. The proposals into consideration embrace “financial diversification” and “impacts of the implementation of response measures on human rights” — matters of particular curiosity to the Saudis, who’ve an oil-centric financial system and have been accused of violating human rights.
Picture by Sean Gallup / Getty Pictures
The talks progressed properly for the primary few days at COP29, in accordance with the three negotiators who had been concerned. However on the finish of the week, Saudi Arabia moved to discredit negotiators from Botswana and Iceland who had been main the dialogue, telling the presidency they weren’t certified and hadn’t produced any outcomes. On the primary day of the convention’s all-important last week, the Azerbaijani presidency then intervened to switch the 2 negotiators criticized by the Saudis and set up a substitute named Andrei Marcu, a veteran COP negotiator from Brussels, Belgium, who’s at the moment affiliated with the Honduran delegation and has represented Belize and Papua New Guinea in previous local weather talks.
The choice to nominate Marcu incensed growing nations and the US, who noticed it as a favor to Saudi Arabia, in accordance with the three delegation members who had been concerned within the response measures talks. In previous COPs, Marcu has sought to chair the “response measures” agenda merchandise, however growing nations have protested and compelled him out, alleging him of steering the committee’s work to favor the pursuits of oil-producing nations.
“We’ve had issues with him earlier than,” stated one negotiator from a growing nation who has been deeply concerned within the talks. Marcu resigned from the position on Tuesday amid criticism from Africa and the US, however the presidency re-appointed him the next day. (The COP29 presidency, the Saudi Arabian delegation, and Marcu all didn’t reply to requests for remark from Grist.)
Stagnation on the problem of fossil fuels seems more likely to push the convention previous its last scheduled day and into the weekend. As accusations flew at press conferences and huddles, the Azerbaijani presidency on noon Thursday convened a plenary session which it styled a qurultay, an Azerbaijani phrase for conference that additionally refers to a kind of historical navy council. Throughout the plenary, a number of nations voiced their dissatisfaction with the established order on decarbonization and fossil fuels or chastised the presidency for failing to make progress on the aim to mobilize as a lot as $1.3 trillion in worldwide local weather finance.
“We now have heard clearly on this room that this textual content is totally disconnected from actual lives,” stated Tina Stege, the local weather envoy from the Marshall Islands, throughout the plenary. “We can not play geopolitics with the lives of our residents.”
A consultant from Saudi Arabia, in the meantime, asserted on the plenary — in obvious disregard for his nation’s personal endorsement of the UAE consensus final yr — that it and different Arab nations “is not going to settle for any textual content that targets particular sectors, together with fossil fuels.”
After the plenary, Stege instructed Grist that the textual content on mitigation was “not a place to begin that works.” On the time, the convention was simply over 24 hours away from its scheduled finish.
