Boeing’s Starliner capsule simply returned to Earth with out astronauts, marking the start of a brand new set of investigations by NASA.
Starliner left the Worldwide House Station (ISS) on Friday night (Sept. 6), then aced a touchdown in New Mexico simply after midnight on Saturday (Sept. 7). The landing introduced an finish to Crew Flight Take a look at (CFT), Starliner’s first-ever astronaut mission. However no astronauts got here down with the capsule on Saturday; Starliner skilled issues with its response management system (RCS) thrusters shortly after CFT’s June 5 liftoff, and NASA determined to not danger placing Williams and Wilmore aboard the capsule once more.
The duo have a stable homecoming plan: They’re going to trip again to Earth in February 2025 aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule — the one that can fly the corporate’s Crew-9 mission, which is about to launch towards the ISS on Sept. 24. However what’s subsequent for the Starliner program is a much bigger query.
NASA tasked SpaceX and Boeing in 2014 with sending astronauts to and from the ISS. SpaceX, borrowing information from its Cargo Dragon spacecraft, flew a Crew Dragon take a look at mission to the station in 2019 with out astronauts and handed all metrics, permitting the corporate to launch its debut astronaut take a look at flight the next yr. That effort was profitable, and SpaceX shortly moved to operational, long-duration astronaut missions to the ISS for NASA. It is in the course of its eighth such flight and is gearing up for the ninth (Crew-9).
Associated: NASA astronauts cannot put on Boeing Starliner spacesuits in SpaceX’s Dragon. This is why
Starliner, a brand new design, has required fairly just a few changes. Its first mission, an uncrewed take a look at flight in December 2019, failed to succeed in the ISS as a result of software program glitches. The capsule succeeded on its second ISS attempt in Might 2022 however skilled just a few points with its propulsion system throughout that flight.
CFT has had hiccups as properly — particularly, helium leaks and the thruster points. (5 of Starliner’s 28 RCS thrusters failed because it chased the ISS down shortly after launch.) The mission was alleged to final simply 10 days or so, however NASA stored Starliner on the ISS for 3 months because it analyzed the thruster issues and what to do about them.
These points look like linked to overheating — a consequence, maybe, each of the frequency of thruster use and their placement inside heat-retaining shelters on the surface of the spacecraft generally known as “doghouses.” Bulging seals and insulation shedding seem to limit the stream of propellant to the RCS thrusters.
NASA and Boeing had hoped that CFT would pave the best way for Starliner’s first operational crewed flight. That mission, generally known as Starliner-1, is tentatively focused for August 2025. Nevertheless it’s too quickly to inform if Starliner will hit that timeline.
“I feel we’ll see the place we’re at in one other month or so, and have a bit bit higher concept of what the general schedule might be,” Steve Stich, supervisor of NASA’s Industrial Crew Program, mentioned throughout a post-landing press convention on Saturday morning.
That schedule may even embrace one other take a look at flight earlier than Starliner is licensed for operational astronaut missions.
“I might say it is most likely too early to consider precisely what the subsequent flight seems to be like. I feel we need to take the subsequent step to go have a look at all the information,” Stich mentioned.
“We have got some issues we all know we have to go work on,” he added. “And we’ll go try this and repair these issues, after which go fly once we’re prepared.”
A lot of this work will concentrate on the RCS thruster overheating concern and learn how to mitigate it.
“What we have to do now could be go take a thruster at White Sands [Test Facility in New Mexico] and ensure we perceive the precise pulse sequences that trigger the heating,” Stich mentioned. “After which, on the identical time, in parallel, have a look at software program adjustments to cut back the variety of calls for on the thrusters.”
Groups may even examine eradicating or altering the thermal blankets contained in the doghouses, to assist maintain the thrusters cooler, he added.
“So it is actually three completely different thrusts, I might say,” Stich mentioned.
However there have been loads of positives to take from CFT, Stich careworn. Starliner carried out very properly throughout its entry, descent and touchdown in the present day, he mentioned, describing the landing in White Sands House Harbor as a “bullseye.” And he estimated that, regardless of Starliner’s points, Boeing was in a position to notch 85% to 90% of CFT’s mission targets.
Joel Montalbano, deputy affiliate administrator for NASA’s House Operations Mission Directorate, additionally emphasised the positives, and sought to place CFT into the correct perspective.
“It is vital to recollect: This was a take a look at mission, proper?” Montalbano mentioned through the post-landing press convention. “We realized from this mission.”
