Choose lifts most sanctions towards Drugs Hat mayor

Article content material

A Calgary choose has put aside most of Drugs Hat council’s sanctions towards town’s mayor, restoring her means to preside over council conferences and her full pay.

In March, the southern Alberta metropolis’s council had sanctioned Mayor Linnsie Clark after reviewing an unbiased investigator’s report on her conduct below town’s code of conduct bylaw.

Article content material

On the March 21 assembly, council had imposed six sanctions on Clark, however following a current one-day listening to in Calgary, Justice Rosemary Nation’s ruling restores most of them. Clark has regained her full wage — reportedly $144,000 — after it was docked by 50 per cent, and he or she is once more in a position to preside over council conferences, act because the official council spokesperson and attend administration committee conferences.

“I discover that (many of the sanctions) are overwhelmingly disproportionate to the breach of the (Drugs Hat’s code of conduct) and no cheap municipal council would have taken that call,” wrote Nation in her 11-page ruling, launched Monday.

Council’s sanctions had been imposed on Clark in after tensions between town’s mayor and supervisor got here to a boil throughout an Aug. 21, 2023, council assembly. Council stated Clark didn’t deal with metropolis supervisor Ann Mitchell with “dignity, courtesy and respect” throughout that assembly.

After the assembly, a councillor made a proper grievance below town’s code of conduct. Following a report from an unbiased investigator, council agreed March 21 that Clark had breached town’s code of conduct bylaw and imposed the six sanctions on the mayor.

Article content material

Article content material

However Nation was essential of council’s sanctions, writing that they’re “on the face very extreme.”

The Court docket of King’s Bench justice wrote that issues like these are usually despatched again to a council with instructions to rethink its determination, however on this case Drugs Hat councillors “seem to don’t have any sense of proportionality in crafting sanctions and have imposed sanctions that don’t have any rational reference to the breach of the (code of conduct).

“In truth, it seems at first blush that Council went down the Sanctions that could be imposed as enumerated in 17.4 of the code and ticked a field for every sanction (a) via (g),” Nation wrote.

However whereas Nation dismissed most of council’s sanctions towards the mayor, the Court docket of King’s Bench justice wrote that publishing a letter reprimanding Clark and asking that Clark apologize to Mitchell was “cheap.”

Council had additionally forbid Clark from coming into the administration space of metropolis corridor and having any direct contact with metropolis employees, apart from at council conferences and  having the ability to e-mail Mitchell. If town supervisor agreed to fulfill Clark in individual, one other councillor needed to be current.

Article content material

Discovering this sanction to be “disproportionate” and unreasonably handcuffing Clark’s means to carry out her duties, Nation has despatched this subject again to council to discover a restriction that “moderately protects” town supervisor but additionally permits Clark to do her job.

In an announcement following the ruling, Clark stated: “I’m more than happy that our Superior Court docket restored my powers, duties and wage — discovering that these sanctions had been overwhelmingly disproportionate to the general public questions I raised throughout our Aug. 21, 2023, assembly.”

She additionally expressed her “honest gratitude” to her supporters all through the method.

Clark grew to become mayor in 2021 after receiving 66 per cent of the vote in the course of the municipal election that 12 months, defeating incumbent Ted Clugston.

However since her victory, she has confronted a recall petition, which a neighborhood resident submitted towards her final fall. The recall effort fell far in need of the province’s threshold, receiving about 8,000 of the 26,000 required signatures.

Article content material