The Mobile Operators Affiliation of India (COAI) isn’t too proud of the TRAI’s suggestions on the framework for service authorisations below the Telecom Act, 2023. COAI needs the prevailing means or the contractual nature of the licenses to proceed within the telecom sector. The Division of Telecommunications (DoT) and telecom operators go right into a legally binding contract when the telecom licenses are issued. These agreements define the rights, obligations and operational parameters for everybody concerned. Nonetheless, now the federal government is seeking to grant service authorisation below Part 3(1) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023, as an alternative of coming into into an settlement with the entity.
Learn Extra – TRAI Mandate to Solely Ship Whitelisted Content material on SMS Involves Impact on Oct 1
COAI mentioned this – “….is with none legitimate justification and goes towards the place of TSPs, whereas additionally undermining the present regime that has labored efficiently for greater than 3 a long time – bringing huge influx of investments and development within the sector.”
The telecom affiliation additionally mentioned that it has been advocating for the discount in license charges and had steered the current charge to be decreased from 3% to 0.5-1%. Together with that, COAI has additionally requested the federal government to abolish the common service obligation fund (USOF) or at the very least pause it till the prevailing funds have been used. Nonetheless, this has not been really helpful by TRAI but, mentioned COAI.
Learn Extra – TRAI Believes VNOs Ought to Accomplice with A number of Telcos
“Moreover, our concern that OTT Communication Providers have been excluded below the brand new authorization as Entry Service is a good concern as this omission perpetuates an uneven aggressive panorama, because the Telecom Service Suppliers (TSPs) proceed to bear the load of in depth compliance and safety necessities,” mentioned COAI.
“OTT Communication Service Suppliers stay largely unregulated, elevating questions not solely about market equity and regulatory consistency within the quickly evolving digital communications sector but in addition about nationwide safety and buyer privateness,” TRAI added.
