Vice President Harris’ debt-ridden presidential marketing campaign spent $2.6 million on personal flights in the previous few weeks of the election season, paperwork present.
The discharge of the findings comes because the debt-saddled marketing campaign, which spent $1 billion on the path, is being scrutinized for the monetary selections it made earlier than shedding the Nov. 5 election to President-elect Trump. The marketing campaign is believed to be $20 million in debt.
The eyebrow-raising bills had been listed in a Federal Election Fee (FEC) submitting obtained by Fox Information Digital. In line with the FEC submitting, within the month of October alone, the Harris marketing campaign spent $2,626,110 on personal flights.
The prices ranged from $3,500 to $940,000 per disbursement, with $2.2 million going to an organization named Personal Jet Companies Group, whereas $430,000 went to Superior Aviation Staff, a constitution flight dealer.
TRUMP APPOINTS TULSI GABBARD AS DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: ‘FEARLESS SPIRIT’
In September, marketing campaign employees spent $3.1 million on personal flights, which brings the flight-related expense complete to greater than $10 million since July.
The expenditures are only a few of a number of monetary selections for which the marketing campaign has been intensely scrutinized. For instance, Harris’ group paid Oprah Winfrey’s manufacturing firm $1 million after the TV star spoke at a rally Oct. 15.
Harris staffers additionally gave $4 million to Village Advertising Company, an organization that connects shoppers with social media influencers. Moreover, FEC information present the marketing campaign spent at the least $15 million on “occasion manufacturing.”
HERE ARE THE MOST TALKED-ABOUT CANDIDATES FOR TOP POSTS IN TRUMP’S ADMINISTRATION
The marketing campaign’s use of personal jets has been criticized in current weeks for each monetary and environmental causes. Personal jets emit extra greenhouse gases per passenger than business flights do, and Harris beforehand stated local weather change was an “existential risk.”
“There’s no query we’ve got to be sensible. However being sensible additionally acknowledges that local weather change is an existential risk to us as human beings,” Harris advised CNN in 2019. “Being sensible acknowledges that greenhouse fuel emissions are threatening our air and threatening the planet and that it’s properly inside our capability as human beings to alter our behaviors in a manner that we are able to cut back its results.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox Information Digital reached out to the Harris marketing campaign for remark.
Fox Information Digital’s Andrew Mark Miller and Aubrie Spady contributed to this report.