Some social media customers expressed incredulity after they discovered that Democrats have gained or are main in U.S. Senate or governor races in states during which Kamala Harris misplaced to Donald Trump.
One Nov. 7 Instagram submit shared a screengrab of an X submit that contained a graphic exhibiting the partisan breakdown of wins in a variety of swing states.
Trump, the graphic confirmed, had gained or was successful the battleground states of Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina and Wisconsin, however Democratic Senate candidates (or in North Carolina, the Democratic gubernatorial candidate) had gained or have been successful their contests in these states.
“What are the chances of this taking place in 5 of the swing states?” phrases within the screengrab stated. “Trustworthy query. And never all Senate incumbents both.”
“One thing stinks,” the Instagram consumer wrote in response. “This doesn’t make any sense.”
(Screengrab from Instagram)
The submit has precisely described the outcomes as they sat by noon Nov. 8, three days postelection. Though these outcomes might not make sense at first look, they occurred for a number of causes.
Join PolitiFact texts
Voters have free will. Presidential and Senate votes are likely to align; in most 2024 Senate races, the identical celebration did win each contests in the identical state. However there’s a long-standing phenomenon referred to as ticket-splitting, during which voters might select a Democrat for one workplace and a Republican for one more.
Ticket splitting has turn into much less widespread in latest election cycles as partisan polarization has elevated. In 2016, each Senate race went to the identical celebration because the presidential race did, and in 2020, solely Maine voters break up their ticket in voting for Republican Sen. Susan Collins and for Joe Biden for president. However the follow hasn’t disappeared fully.
In gubernatorial races, states akin to Kansas, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Carolina and Virginia have chosen a governor of a special celebration than the presidential alternative in the latest election. And, within the present Congress, greater than two dozen U.S. Home members characterize districts that the opposite celebration gained in 2020.
Candidates matter. Voters break up tickets as a result of elections are a alternative between candidates, not simply between events. Incumbency may help candidates; so can a scarcity of controversy, or a much bigger struggle chest for marketing campaign adverts or a better-run marketing campaign.
Two of the Senate races on the record cited within the submit had incumbents prevail (or had them on observe to prevail, pending extra poll counting): Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin and Jacky Rosen of Nevada. Their achievements in workplace and voters’ familiarity might have helped these candidates. Some voters might have needed to ship a message on inflation within the presidential race however determined that the Senate has much less to do with financial situations than the president does.
In the meantime, in North Carolina’s gubernatorial race, Democratic Lawyer Basic Josh Stein confronted Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, a Republican candidate who confronted a flurry of revelations about his previous controversial feedback on race and intercourse. Robinson gained about 40% of the vote in a state during which generic Republican candidates for statewide workplace can often depend on 50% or higher.
And in Arizona, Republican Kari Lake got here to voters’ consideration in 2022 when she misplaced a gubernatorial race constructed closely on claims that elections are fraudulent, together with the presidential race that Biden gained. This 12 months, she misplaced to Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego, a retired U.S. Marine and a Latino in a marketing campaign 12 months during which Latino voters have been pivotal inside the citizens.
Don’t sleep on third events and nonvotes. Within the 4 Senate-race break up selections, the margins have been slender. In these 4 states, the Democratic Senate candidates gained (or are successful) by 17,000 to 44,000 votes; in Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin, Harris misplaced (or is shedding) by between 29,000 and 82,000 votes. Arizona was wider at 155,000.
With such small margins, different components can determine in election outcomes in case you run the mathematics.
In these states’ Senate races, third-party candidates obtained from 39,000 to 170,000 votes; within the presidential race, their haul ranged from 25,000 to 110,000.
Additionally, some folks voted for president however not for a Senate candidate, and should have skipped different down-ballot races. Relying on the state, from 18,000 to 72,000 voters did this, in line with PolitiFact’s calculations from The New York Instances’ working election outcomes web page. If these Senate race-skippers consisted disproportionately of Trump voters, that by itself may have stored a few of these Republican Senate candidates from successful.
Then there’s Nevada’s eccentric poll possibility,”none of those candidates.” Within the presidential race, about 18,000 voters selected this feature; within the Senate race, greater than 40,000 did. The variety of “none of those candidates” voters within the Senate race is greater than twice as giant as Rosen’s present lead.
A nontrivial share of voters selected to again a third-party candidate or decline to decide on anybody within the U.S. Senate race. In some or all of those states, that might have spelled the distinction between victory and defeat.
Our ruling
Social media posts stated “one thing stinks” that Trump gained in a number of battleground states whereas Democrats gained Senate or governor races in these states.
Though there’s a powerful historic correlation between votes forged for president and senator, it’s not ironclad. Voters are free to decide on candidates of various events for various workplaces, and a few fraction of voters does so.
In every of those races, the Democrats benefited from a bonus or two, akin to incumbency or a politically broken opponent, that will have put them excessive.
Lastly, within the 4 Senate races cited, the margins have been slender, which means that third-party voters or voters who selected to vote for president and never the Senate race may have simply spelled the distinction between victory and defeat.
We price the assertion False.
