Inventory buyers beloved Alan Greenspan as a result of the insurance policies he pursued throughout his tenure as chair of the US Federal Reserve benefited the fairness markets. No less than that was the traditional knowledge.
However did the markets mirror this narrative on days when Greenspan testified earlier than Congress? Did they have an inclination to go up as we’d count on, or did their efficiency contradict the narrative? And the way did the markets reply when Jerome Powell and different Fed chairs testified? What does their conduct reveal about how they assessed every Fed chair?
To reply these questions, we pulled S&P 500 and MSCI market and asset class knowledge for all dates on which the final 5 Fed chairs testified earlier than Congress and in contrast the outcomes with each day by day common returns and common return volatility.
To raised isolate market sentiment round every Fed chair, we didn’t embrace Fed charge announcement days in our evaluation. The Fed had already communicated its charge selections to the general public prior to every Fed chair’s congressional look, and the market had presumably taken the choice — to hike, maintain, or cut back charges — into consideration.
So, how did the markets reply to the testimony of every Fed chair? Have been there any standouts or surprises?
Because it seems, Janet Yellen generated probably the most constructive returns on the times when she testified relative to the 4 different Fed chiefs. On common, the S&P 500 rose 0.20% when Yellen spoke and solely 0.08% when Greenspan testified.
On the opposite finish of the spectrum, days when Ben Bernanke or Powell testified are related to extra destructive inventory market efficiency. The S&P 500 returned –0.05% on common on days when Powell or Bernanke appeared earlier than Congress. After all, Bernanke helmed the Fed through the international monetary disaster (GFC) and Powell throughout a interval of resurgent inflation. So, the bearishness they evoked might not be particularly stunning.
Fed Chair Congressional Testimony Common Returns: One-Day Window (%)
| Paul Volcker |
Alan Greenspan |
Ben Bernanke |
Janet Yellen |
Jerome Powell |
|
| S&P 500 | –0.03 | 0.08 | –0.05 | 0.20 | –0.05 |
| Small-Cap Fairness |
0.04 | 0.06 | –0.15 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
| Development Fairness |
–0.03 | -0.02 | –0.01 | 0.08 | –0.11 |
| Worth Fairness |
0.00 | 0.03 | –0.08 | 0.28 | 0.06 |
| Internationwide Fairness |
0.10 | –0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | –0.23 |
| Whole Bond Index |
0.07 | 0.03 | 0.09 | –0.05 | 0.01 |
| Excessive-Yield Debt |
0.06 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
| Brief-Time period Debt |
0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | –0.01 | -0.01 |
We see related outcomes play out throughout small-cap and worldwide equities in addition to worth and development, with Yellen testimony days yielding higher returns than Greenspan’s. We repeated our assessments over a three-day window across the Fed chairs’ congressional testimony and once more generated qualitatively related outcomes.
Bonds informed a distinctly totally different story, nevertheless. Whereas equities outperformed when Yellen testified, fastened earnings went in the other way, with the overall bond index returning –0.05% on days when Yellen appeared earlier than Congress.
Volatility was one other datapoint we explored, with Bernanke testimony days displaying probably the most volatility total.
Customary Deviation of Returns round Fed Chair Testimony Days
| Paul Volcker |
Alan Greenspan |
Ben Bernanke |
Janet Yellen |
Jerome Powell |
|
| S&P 500 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 1.40 | 0.52 | 0.77 |
| Small-Cap Fairness |
0.57 | 0.86 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Development Fairness |
0.35 | 1.17 | 1.30 | 0.82 | 0.85 |
| Worth Fairness |
0.93 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.55 | 0.83 |
| Internationwide Fairness |
0.55 | 0.84 | 1.37 | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| Whole Bond Index |
0.16 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.17 |
| Excessive-Yield Debt |
0.18 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Brief-Time period Debt |
0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
Of all of the Fed chairs, Yellen generated probably the most constructive inventory market reactions and the least volatility over the previous 50 years, at the same time as bond buyers tended to reply negatively to her testimony.
In any other case, each Powell’s and Paul Volcker’s tenures featured various rate of interest hikes in response to rising inflation. The weaker efficiency of equities on their testimony days might mirror how the markets got here to affiliate them each with increased charges.
In case you favored this put up, don’t neglect to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture courtesy of the US Federal Reserve
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can report credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.
