Central banks took an enormous leap on the street to direct market intervention in 2020. All developed market central banks added direct purchases of company bonds to their quantitative easing (QE) packages. As of 31 December 2020, the European Central Financial institution (ECB) and the US Federal Reserve held €250 billion and €46 billion in company bonds on their respective steadiness sheets.
Though these holdings aren’t as large as whole authorities debt, the way in which the Fed performed this financial coverage intervention was moderately novel. It purchased shut to six% of the entire property underneath administration (AUM) in US company bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and outsourced the execution to BlackRock.
It was simply the newest illustration of how buy-side credit score market individuals have advanced for the reason that world monetary disaster (GFC). During the last decade or so, the buy-side construction has grown extremely concentrated, a lot in order that as we speak the world’s high 5 asset administration corporations command greater than 27% of worldwide credit score AUM.
On the similar time, efforts by regulators to discourage extreme risk-taking by monetary intermediaries has restricted the latter’s capability to supply market liquidity. Concurrently, low rates of interest and central financial institution bond shopping for have inflated company bond issuance, making the necessity for liquidity services extra essential than ever.
In consequence, many market individuals have turned to ETFs. Why? As a result of they consider that — as intra-day traded devices invested in lots of index-tracking securities — ETFs can present another supply of liquidity.
Such considering is flawed. Funding in these securities has considerably elevated ETFs’ prominence out there and established a brand new sort of huge and essential buy-side investor within the type of the ETF sponsor. However this investor could not have the identical funding targets or incentives as its conventional buy-side counterparts
Company Bond Market Purchase-Facet Construction
For a few years, credit score markets have been notoriously uncovered to issuer focus danger. The Monetary sector in funding grade (IG) and the Power sector in excessive yield (HY) signify 15% and greater than 20%, respectively, of the danger of every of those markets globally.
However whereas the issuer perspective is vital for assessing danger, buyers must also take into account the buy-side of the market.
The worldwide bond market’s present buy-side construction is difficult to explain objectively. Bonds are generally straight held by non-financial entities or by liability-driven buyers that don’t at all times report all their holdings publicly. For example, information from the Fed’s Circulate of Funds present that funding funds whole near 30% of the company and international fixed-income property held by US entities. Insurance coverage corporations are the most important house owners of those property with a 37.5% share of the entire as of 31 December 2020.
This helps clarify why the results of buy-side focus and the implications for the company bond market construction have up to now been largely ignored.
To evaluate these traits, we used Bloomberg information to construct an aggregated view of all of the funding corporations advising or straight holding securities included within the ICE-BofA World Company and HY indices. This universe of two,847 funding administration corporations covers 33% of the entire world IG and 41% of the worldwide HY indices. Our evaluation confirmed a fabric focus on the investor aspect: 45% of IG and 50% of HY markets are held by the highest 10 funding corporations.
What explains this heightened focus? The mutual fund universe gives some perception. Mutual funds are probably the most actively traded buy-side entities and given their larger availability, they permit for extra in-depth evaluation. However company bonds are eligible investments for a lot of different fixed-income methods, so the universe past company bond-focused mutual funds should be taken under consideration. For the sake of completeness, we’ve got additionally included so-called “Combination” methods in our evaluation, together with company bond-focused ones.
The chart under highlights the extent of buy-side focus: The highest three asset administration corporations signify 28% of AUM, whereas 90% of company bond ETF property are managed by solely three corporations.
AUM Focus amongst Administration Firms by Fund Kind
Statistics aggregated from 7,606 fixed-income mutual funds centered on fixed-income “Combination” or “Company” bonds methods in arduous currencies (CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and USD) with greater than $50 million AUM. Whole AUM for this mutual fund group amounted to $5.4 trillion as of 31 December 2020. The chart above gives two totally different splits of this similar universe: 1. ETFs (principally passive methods as lively ETFs are a really minor a part of the universe) vs. lively. 2. Company IG- vs. company HY-focused mutual funds.
Passive Investing’s Function in Bond Markets
No matter one’s perspective on passive investing or the ETF as an funding automobile, this market is at the moment working in an oligopolistic construction with potential impacts on value formation, liquidity, and the lively administration business as a complete.
Whereas the ETF sector’s share of whole mutual fund business AUM began to rise earlier than the GFC, it accelerated considerably within the aftermath of the disaster. Although ETFs quantity to 9% of the general funds in our evaluation (together with the so-called combination methods), greater than 25% of company IG-focused mutual funds are invested by way of ETFs, as are barely greater than 12% of HY-focused funds.
Share of Passive Funds (ETFs) in Fastened-Revenue Mutual Fund Universes by Technique
Statistics aggregated from 7,606 fixed-income mutual funds centered on fixed-income “Combination” or “Company” bonds methods in arduous currencies (CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and USD) with greater than $50m AUM. Whole AUM for this mutual fund group amounted to $5.4 trillion as of 31 December 2020.
The rise of ETF investing within the company bond market is essentially pushed by the ETF’s potential to effectively replicate broad indices in addition to its exchange-traded characteristic. The latter high quality alleviates problems with value transparency and makes the safety accessible to a broad set of buyers.
Because the GFC and the following regulatory restrictions positioned on monetary establishments, ETFs have develop into the primary liquid devices accessible to numerous buyers for managing credit score publicity. The ETF’s share of flows into or out of the asset class are much more spectacular: ETFs accounted for nearly 50% of inflows into IG company funds and 30% into HY during the last three to 5 years.
ETF Share of USD Fastened-Revenue Fund Inflows
Statistics aggregated from 7,606 fixed-income funds centered on fixed-income “Combination” or “Company” bonds methods in arduous currencies (CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and USD) with greater than $50 million AUM. Whole AUM for this fund group amounted to $5.4 trillion as of 31 December 2020. Flows are computed on a month-to-month foundation first and ETF stream shares on a quarterly foundation.
The Fed’s resolution to incorporate these devices in its pandemic-related QE packages acknowledges this actuality: The liquidity of company bonds is determined by ETF buying and selling circumstances.
But evaluation of the US ETF fairness and fixed-income universes exhibits this premise is just not wholly correct. Excluding probably the most liquid decile of Treasuries funds, fixed-income ETFs seem two- to five-times much less liquid than their fairness counterparts. This helps additional clarify the necessity for the Fed’s intervention within the company bond market in 2020.
Most Low cost to NAV for US-Listed ETFs, Common by Deciles, December 2019 to December 2020
Universe of lively fairness and fixed-income ETFs with AUM above $1 billion as of 31 December 2020
Excessive market environments, similar to that of the March 2020 disaster, remind us that whereas ETFs are exchange-traded devices, that alone doesn’t assure that the underlying securities are resistant to liquidity stress. On the contrary: The excessive focus amongst ETF suppliers — amongst ETF replication algorithms — tends to additionally focus buying and selling strain on particular bonds. These commerce extra typically and incur extra volatility in addition to increased price of liquidity when ETFs come underneath promoting strain.
After all, ETF automobiles aren’t with out prices for buyers. Probably the most missed amongst these are these associated to ETF bonds’ common premium together with the issuer danger concentrations inherent in underlying debt-weighted company bond indices. For these causes, company bond ETFs don’t gather the total market danger premium over the long term.
Given this context, the oligopolistic market construction that has fashioned as a result of affect of ETFs must be acknowledged.
Within the second a part of our evaluation, we’ll lay out the implications this has for buyers in search of to generate alpha from fixed-income markets and thus for portfolio building itself.
In case you preferred this publish, don’t overlook to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Pictures / halans
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.
