Los Angeles County introduced final week that it’s suing PepsiCo and Coca-Cola over plastic air pollution, arguing that the soda giants’ plastic bottles have harmed public well being and the atmosphere and that the businesses knowingly misled the general public about their merchandise’ recyclability.
“Coke and Pepsi have to cease the deception and take accountability for the plastic air pollution issues your merchandise are inflicting,” mentioned Los Angeles County Board Chair Lindsey P. Horvath in a assertion. The lawsuit seeks an injunction in opposition to Coca-Cola and PepsiCo’s “misleading enterprise practices” — their sustainability claims — plus civil penalties and restitution for shoppers who have been misled by these claims.
The 41-page grievance begins with an outline of the plastic air pollution disaster and the way single-use plastics have an effect on California and L.A. County particularly. Though L.A. County is investing tens of millions of {dollars} to gather and handle plastic litter — for instance, by way of road sweepings and enormous trash booms on the mouths of the Los Angeles River and Ballona Creek — it merely can’t sustain with the size of the issue.
Single-use plastics “frequently wash into county waterways and storm and sewer methods,” the go well with says. As soon as within the atmosphere, plastic trash can break down into microplastics and leach endocrine-disrupting chemical substances akin to BPA and phthalates.
Then the grievance describes Coke and Pepsi’s outsize contribution to those issues, utilizing an evaluation from an annual “model audit” carried out by the nonprofit Break Free From Plastic. Final yr, the audit discovered the beverage makers to be the world’s high two plastic polluters, as decided by the collections of plastic with their branding on it by volunteers at world seashore cleanups, which turned up extra of their merchandise than some other firms’. These outcomes are “according to air pollution charges in Los Angeles County,” in line with the grievance.
Pepsi and Coke are among the many largest firms on the planet; Pepsi’s market cap is about $228 billion, and Coke’s is $282 billion. Along with their eponymous strains of sentimental drinks, the 2 firms collectively personal quite a few beverage manufacturers together with Dasani, Fresca, and PowerAde (Coca-Cola merchandise), and Aquafina, Gatorade, and Mountain Dew (PepsiCo merchandise) — all of that are offered in single-use plastic bottles.
“I’ve a whole lot of each concern and anger with the plastic I’m pressured to work together with on a regular basis,” mentioned Emily Parker, an L.A. County resident and a coastal and marine scientist on the nonprofit Heal the Bay, which was not concerned within the grievance. “It’s not doable to stay and performance with out coming into contact with plastic.”
Justin Sullivan / Getty Photos
The crux of the go well with, nonetheless, is the declare that Coca-Cola and PepsiCo knew concerning the issues their plastic bottles would trigger — and that they intentionally misled the general public about them, notably by way of promotion of plastic recycling, but in addition by way of common claims about constructing a “stronger, extra sustainable future for us all.” L.A. County paints these as cynical efforts to appease involved members of the general public, and describes a sample of lacking or failing to make progress on quantitative targets for decreasing the usage of plastics.
In line with L.A. County, Coke and Pepsi have framed plastics recycling as a central resolution to the plastics disaster, misleadingly stating or implying that their bottles are or will in the future be endlessly recyclable. However because of materials constraints, plastic bottles can’t be changed into new bottles repeatedly; most plastics recycling is “downcycling,” which means it’s transformed into lower-quality plastic merchandise like Adirondack chairs that can’t themselves be recycled. Scientists have estimated that, of all of the plastic produced between 1950 and 2015, solely 0.9 % was recycled greater than as soon as.
The grievance requests that the businesses pay restitution “to all victims of their unfair and misleading enterprise practices,” and that they pay civil penalties of as much as $2,500 for every violation of California’s false promoting and unfair competitors legal guidelines.
In response to a request for remark, Pepsi and Coke referred Grist to William Dermody, vp of media and public affairs for the American Beverage Affiliation, an trade group. Dermody mentioned it was “merely not true” that plastic bottles aren’t recycled; in California, he cited a statistic saying that polyethylene terephthalate bottles like Coke’s and Pepsi’s are recycled at a fee of 70 %. He mentioned the businesses’ bottles are “designed to be recycled and remade and may embody as much as 100% recycled plastics.”
L.A. County’s grievance says Coca-Cola and Pepsi’s commercials obscure the truth that the overwhelming majority of the plastic they use is virgin, not recycled. In 2022, solely 13.6 % of the plastic Coke sourced was recycled; that quantity was 6 % for Pepsi.
Eric Buescher, a senior legal professional for the nonprofit San Francisco Baykeeper, mentioned lawsuits like L.A. County’s may “snowball” in the event that they show to be efficient. “In the event that they win and get an ideal consequence, there’s gonna be a whole lot of copycat litigation,” he mentioned.
That mentioned, the same lawsuit filed final yr by New York Lawyer Normal Letitia James in opposition to PepsiCo was dismissed final week on the grounds that it must be as much as the legislative or govt department to deal with plastic air pollution and misinformation. The decide mentioned that, whereas he may consider “no affordable one that doesn’t consider within the imperatives of recycling and being higher stewards of our surroundings, this doesn’t give rise to phantom assertions of legal responsibility that do nothing to resolve the issue that exists.”
Buescher mentioned this appeared like a “hostile” solution to strategy the problem. “Usually, individuals are answerable for the foreseeable penalties of their conduct and for deceptive others about them,” he mentioned. “And decreasing the quantity of plastic manufactured into single-use merchandise would definitely appear to be a solution to at the very least partially clear up the issue.”
It stays to be seen whether or not different judges will agree with Buescher. A number of lawsuits are nonetheless pending, together with one introduced by town of Baltimore in June in opposition to Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Frito Lay over the “public nuisance” represented by their litter, and one introduced by the Sierra Membership in 2021 in opposition to Coca-Cola and different beverage makers for labeling their bottles as “100% recyclable.” Buescher’s personal group, together with Heal the Bay, Surfrider, and the Sierra Membership, lately filed a grievance in opposition to an organization additional up the availability chain: Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest producer of polymers used to make plastics. California Lawyer Normal Rob Bonta additionally sued Exxon Mobil over false promoting and environmental air pollution.
Parker, with Heal the Bay, mentioned all of the lawsuits share the identical overarching objective: to cease firms from producing a lot plastic. “I’ve been concerned in plastic air pollution work for a very long time, and the factor that we’ve realized is that cleanup isn’t sufficient,” she mentioned. “We’ve got to be holding all varieties of plastic producers answerable for the mess they’ve made of our surroundings and for the hurt that’s being triggered to our our bodies.”
