SpaceX has taken its dispute with the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to Capitol Hill.
On Tuesday (Sept. 17), the FAA introduced that it plans to positive SpaceX $630,000 for allegedly skirting laws on two launches final 12 months. SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk responded to the information that very same day, declaring on X (previously Twitter) that the corporate intends to sue the FAA “for regulatory overreach.”
Now, the corporate has despatched a letter to Congress contesting the proposed positive and calling out the company for transferring too slowly.
The 2 missions cited by the FAA had been PSN SATRIA, an Indonesian communications satellite tv for pc that rode to orbit atop a Falcon 9 rocket on June 18, 2023, and EchoStar XXIV/Jupiter 3, one other telecom craft, which lifted off on a Falcon Heavy on July 28 of that 12 months.
Each launches occurred on Florida’s Area Coast — PSN SATRIA from SpaceX’s pad at Cape Canaveral Area Pressure Station and EchoStar XXIV/Jupiter 3 from Pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Area Heart (KSC), which is correct subsequent door.
Associated: SpaceX launches PSN SATRIA communications satellite tv for pc for Indonesia, lands rocket at sea (video)
The FAA claimed SpaceX violated two laws on the PSN SATRIA launch: The corporate used a brand new launch management room and eliminated a readiness ballot (normally taken two hours previous to liftoff) with out ready for both modification to be accepted. The corporate had submitted a request to make these revisions, however that request had not been accepted by the point of liftoff, in keeping with the FAA.
For EchoStar XXIV/Jupiter 3, SpaceX used a newly constructed rocket propellant farm at KSC that had not but been greenlit, the FAA acknowledged.
SpaceX contests these alleged violations at size within the new letter, which it despatched to the chair and rating member of each the U.S. Home Committee on Science, Area and Know-how and the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
For almost two years, SpaceX has voiced its considerations with the FAA’s lack of ability to maintain tempo with the industrial spaceflight business. It’s clear that the Company lacks the sources to well timed assessment licensing supplies, but in addition focuses its restricted sources on areas unrelated to… pic.twitter.com/2NJu00ZLiWSeptember 19, 2024
For instance, the letter — which SpaceX additionally posted on X and emailed to journalists — claims that there isn’t a requirement within the launch laws to conduct a readiness ballot two hours earlier than liftoff. “Importantly, SpaceX conducts a ballot previous to propellant loading, later within the depend, in line with secure operations,” the corporate wrote.
The letter goes into nice element in regards to the different two alleged infractions, explaining why SpaceX doesn’t view them as such. As an illustration, the corporate famous that, on Aug. 20, 2023, the FAA issued a waiver permitting using the propellant farm forward of SpaceX’s launch of the Crew-7 astronaut mission for NASA, which lifted off from KSC on Aug. 26 of that 12 months.
“The waiver that the FAA issued acknowledged that granting the waiver ‘wouldn’t jeopardize public well being and security, the protection of property, or any nationwide safety or overseas coverage curiosity of the USA,'” SpaceX wrote.
“Since SpaceX’s operations for the Echostar XXIV/Jupiter 3 launch and the Crew-7 launch had been the identical as associated to the brand new RP-1 farm, it isn’t clear why the FAA made a optimistic security dedication for the Crew-7 launch, however couldn’t do the identical for the Echostar XXIV/Jupiter 3 launch,” the corporate added. (RP-1 is the kerosene propellant utilized by the Merlin engines on the Falcon 9 and the Falcon Heavy.)
General, SpaceX wrote, the corporate “forcefully rejects the FAA’s assertion that it violated any laws.”
The letter additionally criticizes the FAA extra usually, claiming that the company is holding the American launch business again.
“For effectively over a 12 months now, SpaceX has voiced its considerations with the FAA’s lack of ability to maintain tempo with the industrial area business and the wants of U.S. Authorities companies that depend on industrial area launch functionality for nationwide safety and nationwide priorities,” concludes the doc, which is signed by David Harris, SpaceX vp for authorized.
A few of SpaceX’s frustration stems from what it sees as over-regulation of Starship, the large new rocket the corporate is growing to assist settle the moon and Mars. SpaceX claims it has been able to launch Starship’s fifth check flight since early August, however the FAA says that approval for the liftoff seemingly will not come till late November.
The company has stated that it and its companions want extra time to assessment potential environmental impacts, in addition to modifications that SpaceX made to Starship’s configuration and mission profile after its fourth check flight, which occurred in June.
