The Artwork and Science of DC Plan Funding Design

Since their emergence within the Nineteen Seventies, outlined contribution (DC) plans in the US have advanced. One notable change has been a shift in how they develop funding lineups for participant-directed DC plans. Plan sponsors are progressing from merely utilizing generally held funding beliefs to making a construction that deliberately considers the traits and wishes of their distinctive group of individuals.

On this article, I define the method for creating such a construction from an asset class perspective. A key element to considerate DC plan funding design is crafting a diversified funding construction earlier than deciding on particular funding automobiles.

Regulatory Basis & Steerage for Funding Menu Construction

The Worker Retirement Earnings Safety Act of 1974 (ERISA) mandates that plan fiduciaries act prudently and diversify the plan’s investments to attenuate the danger of enormous losses. By offering a better diploma of asset class diversification, plan sponsors can allow extra alternatives for individuals who self-direct their retirement account to mitigate funding danger.

For DC plans topic to ERISA, there are a number of prescriptive necessities, together with a principles-based normal of care (responsibility of loyalty and responsibility of care) that plan fiduciaries should comply with when constructing a plan’s funding construction. Even for plans not topic to ERISA, many plan sponsors take into account the rules set forth below ERISA as greatest observe and select to implement them.

Usually, ERISA part 404(c) gives DC plan fiduciaries safety from the legal responsibility for participant funding selections if they provide a minimal of three diversified funding choices that bear materially totally different danger and return traits, comparable to fairness, mounted earnings, and money equivalents.

In observe, it’s fairly uncommon for an funding construction to be restricted to only three funding choices. It is because many funding fiduciaries imagine that providing a bigger, diversified alternative set is helpful for individuals. Beneath the Pension Safety Act of 2006, sure pre-diversified funding choices, comparable to Goal Date Funds (TDFs), are thought-about certified default funding options (QDIA), which gives a protected harbor to mitigate fiduciary danger.

The US Division of Labor (DOL) gives steering for the collection of TDFs in addition to periodic opinions of continued suitability. The DOL steering is greatest observe and plan sponsors ought to leverage it when evaluating TDF utilization of their plan’s funding construction. Plan sponsors ought to set up a structured course of that first identifies a TDF philosophy after which opinions participant demographic knowledge, together with retirees, to evaluate and finally choose an acceptable TDF suite. The identical participant knowledge evaluate can also be helpful when assessing a plan’s core funding construction.

Past ERISA necessities and elective protected harbor provisions, DC plans’ named funding fiduciaries and their 3(21) funding advisors and three(38) funding managers have wide-ranging funding construction flexibility if selections are made in the very best curiosity of individuals and beneficiaries. Such flexibility permits for an array of appropriate funding choices, which might be overwhelming for plan sponsors.

Crafting a Sturdy Funding Construction

Whereas the variability of DC plan participant teams’ wants and traits precludes a set formulation of a “proper” or “flawed” funding lineup design course of, plan sponsors ought to preserve a prudent and documented choice course of to fulfill their fiduciary obligations below ERISA.

A complete design course of is multi-step, calls for engagement by a plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee, and is greatest led by a certified retirement plan advisor who’s dedicated to facilitating committee conversations and making ready demographic and fund utilization opinions, amongst different duties.

A Pattern Course of in Seven Steps

1. Establish a objective & targets assertion

Establish the corporate’s philosophy concerning the DC plan’s major objective and targets. Pattern statements and their potential impression on funding construction:

Function: It will be important that our DC plan mirror the corporate’s objective to advertise a tradition of “retirement atmosphere.” This may manifest as: lengthy worker tenure, workers who generally retire from our firm, and retirees who discover it engaging to retain their DC plan accounts within the employer’s plan all through retirement.

Potential impression: The aim assertion would possibly recommend that plan asset lessons and TDFs assist a retiree’s must diversify mounted earnings allocations, as a result of mounted earnings sometimes turns into a bigger portion of an investor’s portfolio close to all through retirement.

Function: It will be important that our DC plan additional the corporate’s objective of supporting workers as they save and make investments for retirement. We observe that our firm has a protracted historical past of using principally early-career individuals, and based mostly on previous expertise, we count on excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements from the corporate. When retirements happen, we observe that accounts are faraway from the DC plan shortly thereafter.

Potential impression: The aim assertion would possibly advantage the inclusion of a number of fairness asset lessons and core or core plus mounted earnings as a result of, for the non-TDF investor phase, this design would offer for enough fairness diversification, whereas minimizing the necessity to allocate to separate mounted earnings sub-asset lessons. It additionally would possibly lend itself to a TDF designed for top fairness allocations early in its glide path and low-to-moderate fairness allocations (relative to the TDF universe common) close to the goal retirement age.

2. What p.c of individuals are enrolled in managed account providers and/or self-directed brokerage accounts?

Participant enrollment in a managed account service is often low sufficient that it doesn’t affect the plan’s general funding construction, apart from guaranteeing the service’s minimal required asset lessons are included. But when the managed account service serves because the plan’s QDIA, and retention within the QDIA is excessive, determine the asset lessons the managed account supplier will use and never use. Carry out a cost-benefit evaluation of together with asset lessons past these required by the managed service supplier.

3. Develop a participant group profile to know the plan’s buyers.

A DC plan’s participant group profile must be based mostly on demographics and investor sort. Since every plan’s participant group has various demographic traits, don’t depend on participant group averages for info comparable to age, compensation, training stage, and firm tenure. Analyzing averages usually fails to mirror the breadth of a plan’s distinctive participant group, in addition to any concentrated segments that signify the most important variety of individuals.

When creating the participant group profile, consider what greatest describes the largest variety of individuals. Plan sponsors might divide individuals into the next classes:

a. Investor sort

The “do it for me” sort: Members who elect to put money into the QDIA; any fund with broad asset allocation, comparable to goal danger or different asset allocation funds; or a managed account service.
The “do it myself” sort: Members who elect to take a position principally in particular person asset class funds or a self-directed brokerage account.

If “do it for me” is the plan’s predominant investor sort, the funding construction might or might not must comprise greater than the first asset lessons relying on the profile of the “do it myself” buyers. For instance, if the “do it myself” buyers have a excessive stage of funding proficiency or are prone to have their very own private funding advisors, the funding construction could also be justifiably extra complete. Nonetheless, relying on the traits and variety of the “do it myself” buyers, advert hoc requests from individuals for particular sub-asset class choices and different funding automobiles could also be greatest addressed by providing a self-directed brokerage choice.

b. Demographic profile

Establish the quantity and p.c of individuals by age vary and investor sort.
Search for any prevalent age cohorts. Understanding the focus in every age cohort can sign consideration for particular wants.

c. Funding proficiency of non-QDIA buyers

Rank the committee’s notion of participant funding proficiency as excessive, medium, or low. Funding proficiency might be estimated based mostly on how effectively the “do it myself” group makes use of non-QDIA asset lessons. For instance, is there a sample of choosing few asset lessons, and does the sample fluctuate by age cohort?
It’s cheap to count on early-career individuals to make use of fewer asset lessons. For this cohort, there’s prone to be a concentrate on equities over mounted earnings. It’s cheap to imagine the chosen variety of asset lessons would improve for mid- and late-career cohorts as a result of diversification and danger mitigation are inclined to grow to be extra valued.
One other strategy to observe funding proficiency is through the use of a scatter plot of participant fairness/mounted earnings allocation splits by age, in comparison with a pattern TDF allocation. The plan’s recordkeeper ought to be capable of present this info. If the scatter plot reveals extensive dispersion from the pattern TDF allocation, it’s cheap to imagine funding proficiency is probably going low. A low diploma of funding proficiency can affect whether or not the funding construction designed for non-QDIA buyers might be streamlined by excluding non-core asset lessons, comparable to commodities.

d. Draw back danger tolerance

Utilizing an identical low-medium-high score system, gauge draw back danger tolerance of the most important participant phase. Draw back danger tolerance is a essential consider intentional funding construction design and QDIA choice.

To assist determine participant draw back danger tolerance, plan sponsors can:

Evaluate recordkeeping studies of transfers into and out of funding choices throughout calendar quarters instantly following a market downturn or massive loss in a selected asset class.
If the business doesn’t require post-secondary training for many workers, draw back danger tolerance is comparatively low and most plan sponsors will eclude asset lessons topic to extra frequent and vital losses. Alternatively, if superior ranges of training are required, plan sponsors might wish to assume a reasonable to excessive stage of draw back danger tolerance.

e. Stability of workforce

If turnover and liquidations by laid-off workers are excessive, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction and any TDFs supplied ought to lean towards a low draw back danger profile.

f. Presence of an outlined profit pension plan

Along with the DC plan, does the corporate additionally sponsor an outlined profit pension plan that it intends to maintain energetic with continued profit accruals? Does it present enough, focused alternative earnings to long-term workers? If sure, does the corporate view the DC plan as “supplemental”? On this occasion, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction of the DC plan could also be restricted to broad, core asset lessons.

4. Evaluate the variety of asset class choices.

The variety of asset lessons must be knowledgeable by the plan’s objective and targets assertion and participant group profile, reasonably than proactively setting an arbitrary restrict on the variety of asset lessons. The latter motion might lead to plan sponsors overlooking the very best pursuits and wishes of “do it myself” buyers. As the preferred QDIA, TDFs enable much less engaged individuals, or these with decrease funding proficiency, to keep away from confusion or challenges in making asset allocation selections.

The common variety of funding choices has declined as a result of individuals who’re much less comfy making knowledgeable funding selections now have better entry to pre-diversified choices like TDFs or managed accounts. For reference, the common variety of funding choices (not asset lessons) supplied by plans is presently 21. The three highest ranges by respondents had been:

1 to fifteen choices: 21.5%,
16 to twenty choices: 26.2%
26 or extra: 25.9%

5. Keep away from sophisticated funding menu design.

If the participant group profile suggests a streamlined funding construction and variety of funding choices, maintain the next factors in thoughts.

A number of funding choices in the identical asset lessons: Provide just one choice per asset class except the choices encompass an energetic and passive implementation.
World fairness and stuck earnings: If the funding construction has separate home and worldwide asset lessons, world asset lessons might lead to unintended overlap.
Sector, regional, and country-specific asset lessons, excluding actual property funding trusts (REITs): These asset lessons have better danger publicity as a result of their extra particular or concentrated nature and different areas of the funding construction additionally doubtless have publicity to them. Bear in mind that this may occasionally result in overlap and unintentional, massive allocations to particular areas of the market.
Single-commodity asset lessons: If commodities are acceptable for the plan’s funding construction, the diversification impact of together with a automobile with broad-based commodity publicity might assist mitigate the danger related to publicity to a single commodity, comparable to gold, oil, or small teams of commodities like valuable metals.
Goal danger: Goal danger funds, which preserve a hard and fast or restricted vary of fairness versus mounted earnings, are vulnerable to unintentional misuse by individuals who stay in the identical fund for longer than acceptable, reasonably than shifting to lower-risk, lower-equity allocation variations as their time horizons lower.
Cash market and secure worth funds: Steady worth funds have traditionally outperformed cash market funds as a result of they’ll put money into intermediate-term bonds and preserve principal safety via wrap insurance coverage. Together with each cash market and secure worth funds can complicate participant asset motion as a result of cash market funds are deemed “competing funds” to secure worth. Steady worth funds don’t allow direct transfers to competing funds comparable to cash market or different low-duration mounted earnings funds.

6. Evaluate historic efficiency previous to asset class choice.

Evaluate historic efficiency for the final 10 years of all asset lessons thought-about for lineup inclusion to determine asset lessons which might be too unstable or topic to massive losses. It will assist the committee perceive their historic patterns and magnitude of positive factors and losses. Deal with the most important positive factors and largest losses for every asset class in the course of the 10-year interval. Evaluate the usual deviation for five- and 10-year intervals.

7. Replace the group’s funding coverage assertion to doc permissible asset lessons.

Verify the DC plan’s Funding Coverage Assertion (IPS) to substantiate it expressly permits the specified asset lessons. Amend the IPS, if wanted, earlier than making funding construction modifications to the plan menu.

Placing the Participant Group Profile into Apply

Listed here are two potential situations and the ensuing pattern funding constructions:

Participant Group A:

Plan objective assertion: It will be important that our DC plan helps the corporate’s objective of making a “retirement atmosphere” tradition that promotes lengthy tenure of employment with frequent retirements from our firm, and for retirees to search out it engaging to retain their plan accounts all through retirement.
Plan presently affords a managed account service.
The “do it myself” buyers signify 60% of individuals. The most important age cohort is ages 50-80, and individuals have a excessive stage of funding proficiency.
Eighty p.c of retirees go away their account within the plan for the long run and take systematic withdrawals following retirement.
The “do it for me” buyers signify 40% of individuals. The most important age cohort is the 21-40-year vary, and individuals have a excessive stage of funding proficiency.
The workforce is secure and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Instructed asset lessons:

Home fairness
- Massive cap: development, core, and worth
- Mid cap: development, core, and worth
- Small cap: development, core, and worth
Worldwide fairness
- Massive cap: development, core, and worth
Fastened earnings
- Treasury inflation-protected securities
Worldwide mounted earnings
Broad-based commodities
Asset allocation (TDFs)

Participant Group B:

Plan objective assertion: It will be important that our DC plan displays the corporate’s objective of making a tradition that helps workers as they save and make investments for retirement. Our group tends to make use of predominantly early profession folks. We count on and have traditionally skilled excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements. When retirements happen, accounts are faraway from the plan shortly thereafter.
Plan doesn’t presently supply a managed account service.
The “do it myself” buyers signify 20% of individuals. The most important age cohort is 40-45 years, and individuals have a reasonable stage of funding proficiency.
Plan affords a self-directed brokerage choice, utilized by roughly half of the “do it myself” buyers.
The few individuals that stay within the plan previous age 65 have traditionally rolled over their accounts to particular person retirement accounts inside two years post-retirement.
The “do it for me” buyers signify 80% of individuals and there aren’t any age cohorts with a materially larger focus than others. Members are assumed to have a low stage of funding proficiency.
The workforce is secure and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Instructed asset lessons:

Home fairness
Worldwide fairness
Fastened earnings
Worldwide mounted earnings
Asset allocation (TDFs)

Empowering Plan Sponsors

Utilizing an knowledgeable, structured funding design course of will bolster DC plan sponsor confidence that funding lineup choice selections are tailor-made to the wants of most plan individuals. The funding menu design course of ought to allow the plan sponsor to really feel educated about how the group arrived at its plan’s funding construction and why, in addition to present the knowledge essential to doc a prudent decision-making course of, a key tenant of fiduciary responsibility below ERISA.

For those who preferred this put up, don’t neglect to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Heart.

All posts are the opinion of the writer(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.

The fabric offered herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The knowledge contained herein was obtained from sources deemed dependable. Such info shouldn’t be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The knowledge contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.

PNC might present hyperlinks to different websites. Content material on such websites is offered solely for the person’s comfort. PNC makes no guarantee of any sort concerning that content material and linking to such content material doesn’t represent or point out sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation in any method.

The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution shouldn’t be registered as a municipal advisor below the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Client Safety Act.

“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth.

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can file credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.