Whoever results in the White Home after subsequent week’s presidential election will face a set of crises associated to the unchecked manufacturing of plastics: poisonous air pollution and greenhouse gasoline emissions from manufacturing amenities, chemical substances leaching from the 20 million metric tons of plastic that winds up within the surroundings yearly, and microplastic contamination all through individuals’s our bodies, simply to call a number of.
Fortunately, there are a selection of the way the subsequent chief govt may tackle the issue. Forward of the election, the nonprofit Past Plastics has launched an inventory of 27 priorities for the subsequent presidential administration — a type of want record of the way to considerably scale back the manufacturing, use, and disposal of plastics “for the sake of public well being and the surroundings.” It builds on earlier calls for for a “Plastic-Free President,” put collectively by a coalition of environmental teams simply earlier than President Joe Biden assumed workplace.
“For whoever is elected president, I feel we’re at a key second” to sort out the plastics disaster, mentioned Judith Enck, Past Plastic’s president and a former regional administrator for the Environmental Safety Company.
Based on Enck, a very powerful factor the world can do to mitigate plastic’s harms is to cease making a lot of it within the first place. Of the 420 million metric tons of plastic produced globally yearly, solely 9 p.c will get recycled — the remaining is shipped to landfills or incinerators, or turns into litter within the surroundings. The U.S. president can’t clear up the issue on their very own, however they will help decreased plastic manufacturing as a part of the worldwide plastics treaty being negotiated by the United Nations. These negotiations have been ongoing since 2022 and have been initially scheduled to conclude by the top of this 12 months, however Enck suspects they’ll be prolonged into 2025. If that’s the case, the subsequent president can have a possibility so as to add specificity to the Biden administration’s dedication — introduced in mid-August — to help limits on plastic manufacturing and using hazardous chemical components within the pact.
Getty IImages
If the treaty is finally ratified by Congress — maybe a tall order, given the Senate’s tendency to reject worldwide agreements — then it’ll grow to be legally binding, and the chief department should work with lawmakers to implement it. Relying on what’s within the last textual content of the pact, this might contain passing a nationwide packaging discount legislation, a invoice to incentivize the reclamation and recycling of plastic bottles, or a coverage requiring new washing machines to come back with filters to forestall plastic microfibers from escaping into waterways. After all, the White Home and Congress may nonetheless pursue these insurance policies if the U.S. isn’t a celebration to the worldwide plastics treaty. Lots of them are already included in some kind as a part of the Break Free From Plastic Air pollution Act, a Democratic invoice that was launched for the third time throughout this 12 months’s legislative session.
Impartial of the treaty and congressional issues, there are lots of different actions the subsequent president may take to handle the plastics disaster.
Past Plastics requires the subsequent presidential administration to situation a moratorium on new or renewed permits for petroleum refining and plastics manufacturing vegetation, in addition to amenities devoted to “chemical recycling” — a time period for processes that supposedly use warmth and strain to reconstitute low-quality plastics into new merchandise however which have largely didn’t ship on that promise. These restrictions may advance environmental justice, since petrochemical and chemical recycling amenities are sometimes situated in low-income communities that bear the brunt of related air and water air pollution.
The following president may additionally situation an govt order for federal businesses to part out sure sorts of monetary help to the petrochemical trade — like Vitality Division grants for analysis on chemical recycling and federal mortgage ensures for plastic incineration amenities. Federal businesses also can be certain that plastic corporations really pay up when getting into into settlement agreements associated to the air pollution they’ve triggered, and that they don’t deduct these funds from their taxes. Enck urged that authorities funding be redirected to constructing out reuse infrastructure: issues like water stations, dishwashing gear in public colleges, and industrial bottle washing operations for breweries and wineries.
The following presidential administration may direct govt businesses just like the Justice Division and the Federal Commerce Fee to pursue extra interventions. The previous may launch investigations into the plastics trade for contributing to marine and terrestrial air pollution, and for falsely promoting plastics’ recyclability — as some state lawyer generals have already executed. The latter may strengthen its tips on plastic-related sustainability claims by way of a doc known as the Inexperienced Guides, and it may deliver enforcement actions towards corporations that use the “chasing arrows” recycling image on non-recyclable plastic merchandise.
Mario Tama / Getty Photos
“We want our leaders to protect towards trade’s false options, together with towards plastic recycling,” mentioned Erica Cirino, communications supervisor for the nonprofit Plastic Air pollution Coalition, which was not concerned in Past Plastics’ record of priorities.
Past Plastics additionally requires the subsequent administration’s Labor Division to create a “simply transition” plan for petrochemical trade employees affected by plastic-reduction measures; for the Nationwide Institute of Well being to fund research on the well being impacts of microplastics and nanoplastics, the tiny fragments that shear off of bigger plastic gadgets over time; and for the Common Providers Administration to prioritize reusable or refillable choices in all federally funded buildings and establishments. That final motion merchandise would construct on a dedication unveiled by the Biden administration in July to stop federal procurement of single-use plastics from all federal operations by 2035.
The record of regulatory potentialities is so lengthy that some consultants argue there’s a necessity for a “plastics czar,” akin to the function of local weather czar that has been performed by John Podesta, John Kerry, and Gina McCarthy. “Due to the scope and the breadth of the plastic situation throughout its life cycle, all businesses have a task to play,” mentioned Rachel Karasik, a plastics analysis scientist on the Norwegian Institute for Water Analysis, which focuses on a variety of water-related points, together with plastic air pollution. “A plastics czar may assist mobilize and coordinate that in a very significant manner.”
Enck mentioned she’s “cold and hot” on the title “czar,” however agreed that it might be useful to have a top-level White Home consultant on plastics to offer management. She additionally mentioned will probably be necessary for the subsequent administration to make sure varied our bodies, together with the Council on Environmental High quality, the Nationwide Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Division of Vitality, are led by workers who’re well-informed on plastics.
Plastics trade teams don’t have their very own bullet-point record of priorities for the subsequent presidential administration. But when they did, it might probably be in direct opposition to a lot of what Past Plastics is looking for. The American Chemistry Council has beforehand known as on the White Home to help elevated plastic manufacturing with a view to meet “sustainable improvement and local weather change objectives.” (Plastics are utilized in renewable power applied sciences and to “ship clear ingesting water,” the trade group mentioned in an April press launch.)
Deb Cohn-Orbach / UCG / Common Photos Group through Getty Photos
The American Chemistry Council and different lobbying teams additionally oppose restrictions on plastic-related chemical substances, chemical recycling, and authorities procurement of single-use plastics, in addition to updates to the Inexperienced Guides to make it tougher to promote merchandise as recyclable. They’ve come out towards proposed laws to ban plastic foam and cease corporations from releasing pre-production plastic pellets into waterways. As an alternative, the trade favors insurance policies that promote plastics recycling, together with loosened federal air air pollution laws for chemical recycling amenities and the legitimation of a misleading manner of calculating recycled content material often called “mass steadiness.” A number of of those priorities are outlined in a bipartisan federal recycling invoice launched final month. The invoice is extensively supported by pro-plastic lobbyists.
If former President Donald Trump assumes the White Home subsequent 12 months, advocates fear that he would implement a few of these wish-list gadgets from the federal recycling invoice, since they don’t all require congressional approval. Throughout his earlier time period, he took credit score for the opening of a brand new petrochemical facility in Pennsylvania and derided bans on single-use plastic. And based on a former Trump White Home official who spoke to Politico in April, Trump would additionally take a “hard-nosed look” at any end result of the plastic treaty negotiations and doubtlessly reject it.
“If Trump wins and it’s a very good treaty, he’ll simply pull us out the way in which that occurred with the Paris accords,” Enck mentioned, referring to the United Nations’ 2015 settlement to sort out international warming.
If Vice President Kamala Harris wins, environmental advocates predict she’s going to proceed lots of the Biden administration’s efforts to handle the plastics disaster, like supporting manufacturing limits as a part of the U.N. plastics treaty and phasing out single-use plastic gadgets from federal operations. Enck mentioned Harris is more likely to retain present heads of the Environmental Safety Company, the Federal Commerce Fee, and the Common Providers Administration — plus different businesses — who usually tend to help environmental priorities than potential Trump appointees.
