By Emmanuel Ande Ivorgba, PhD. Govt Director, Centre for Religion and Neighborhood Growth (CFCD)
INTRODUCTION
The normal idea of management relies on the notion that leaders are chosen to command management and make last choices for the collective group. Nevertheless, by means of this viewpoint, management is seen not solely as an train of authority but additionally on the authorized grounds. As societies turn into extra complicated, technical calls for of the state develop, and choice authority turns into specialised. We’re extra naturally involved with what leaders do with the job, and what they’re and their conduct. In a rustic of high-rank public-private sector forms, leaders at totally different administration hierarchical ranges play a serious position in shaping the course of political life. They contribute to our understanding concerning the position of political management in coverage formulation.
Nigeria, with its huge quantity of pure sources, is at the moment present process fast financial decline. There’s a excessive incidence of poverty, escalating inflation, stability of fee issues, in addition to heavy debt-servicing issues. The basis explanation for this financial downside stems from the pursuit of an inappropriate financial coverage. The dominance of poor management in coverage formulation in Nigeria can clearly be recognized as the principle supply of the issues. Political management is pivotal and vital in shaping the financial panorama of any nation (Klarin, 2020). The standard of any nation’s political management can considerably decide or affect such nation’s general financial growth trajectory. Nigeria is blessed with a vibrant human inhabitants, abundance of pure sources. These sources, coupled with the good entrepreneurial spirit and resilience of the residents, have positioned Nigeria as a possible continental financial powerhouse. Sadly, and disappointedly so, weak institutional frameworks, coupled with corruption, coverage inconsistencies and different quite a few governance challenges, have constituted obstacles to the nation’s lack of ability to successfully and effectively harness its financial potential (Ogunleye & Adeleye, 2018).
Financial growth is a measure of the rise of per capita earnings, which is itself, a operate of the expansion price of nationwide earnings (Mankiw & Taylor, 2014). Nationwide earnings progress relies upon largely on, political management stability in addition to the suitable financial insurance policies carried out by the political management. Additionally, insights into the affect of political management on the socio-economic growth allow one to know the roots of the poverty lure by which many creating nations are caught. Understanding why nations have the kind of leaders they do have and what determines a politician to control nicely or govern poorly assist us admire the positions of governance. This paper seeks to discover the intricate and dynamic relationship between political management and financial growth in Nigeria. The paper will briefly look at the historic context, challenges and alternatives in Nigeria’s financial panorama, key coverage choices, and governance buildings to unravel the influence of political management on key financial indicators equivalent to job creation, infrastructure growth, poverty alleviation, GDP progress, and international direct funding. The paper will present insights into how efficient management can catalyze constructive financial transformation and propel inclusive progress and growth in Nigeria. BACKGROUND With a human inhabitants of over 230 million, and wealthy in pure sources, Nigeria, popularly known as the “Large of Africa” (UK Essays, 2018), and continental powerhouse (Akindele, et al. 2012), holds huge potential for financial progress and growth. Regardless of this abundance of human and pure sources, the nation has confronted quite a few complicated challenges and struggles on its path to financial prosperity. Nigeria has skilled vital political, social, and financial adjustments since its independence from British colonial rule in 1960. Political management continues to play a central position in Nigeria’s destiny. Typically, the consequences of political stability on financial growth underscore the truth that political alternatives drive the financial insurance policies in nations, particularly these which are exterior versus inner elements. The effectiveness of political management in offering one of the best alternatives for financial insurance policies can be essential as a result of the character of the steadiness is pushed by how the political market works in numerous nations. Total, many various kinds of political markets result in various kinds of coverage commitments. The influence of political management attributes is manifested by means of various levels of political stability, democratization, earnings inequality, and governance high quality. The historic context of Nigeria’s financial growth efforts has been formed by a fancy interaction of things. These embrace the legacies of the colonial period, post-independence governance buildings, the invention of oil and Nigeria’s dependence on oil, political instability and social inequalities, amongst others. The nation has skilled lengthy durations of army rule, and army coups, disrupting democratic processes, with profound repercussions on financial administration and coverage consistency. Whereas the invention of oil in business portions within the Fifties supplied a singular alternative for the transformation of Nigeria’s financial system and acceleration of the event course of, the nation’s over-reliance and dependence on oil revenues, and neglect of significantly, manufacturing and agriculture, uncovered the nation’s financial system to exterior shocks and volatility. This has been additional compounded by the mismanagement of oil revenues and the absence of, or lack of diversification. Totally different administrations and political leaders in Nigeria, have carried out a number of financial insurance policies which have generated each constructive and unfavorable impacts on the nation’s financial system. Moreover, the socio-political dynamics coupled with regional disparities, ethno-religious tensions, poverty, youth unemployment, amongst others, underscore the multidimensional complexities that Nigeria’s political leaders should handle to be able to foster inclusive and sustainable nationwide financial progress. POLITICAL LEADERSHIP IN NIGERIA From the start, the political management has been infused with a level of army dominance and army pursuits. Their unwillingness to relinquish management of governance and the financial system uncovered Nigeria’s management to ineffective insurance policies that advocate autocracy, protect custom, uphold the outdated strategies as a substitute of creating inventive and entrepreneurial components to thrive when addressing financial growth and socio[1]financial change. Political management in Nigeria is primarily devoted to self-interests and methods. This inadequacy largely refuses them from seeing the necessity for Nigeria to plot and implement the strategic financial growth insurance policies quite than the normal growth-based doctrines supplied and promoted by worldwide financial analysts and worldwide financial ideologues. The autocratic coverage fashions are directed at reinforcing figureheads and in addition present ‘cocktail’ options primarily to take care of political rivalry. Because of this, coverage management evolves much less in the way in which of the nation’s financial and social growth. An essential attribute of Nigeria’s political management is the position of ethnic and non secular affiliations in shaping political alliances and energy buildings. Ethno-religious dynamics and blocs have performed a major position in figuring out political outcomes and management appointments (Akande, 2016). This has usually resulted in a fragmented political panorama, with leaders usually prioritizing the pursuits of their very own ethnic or spiritual teams over these of the nation as an entire. Additionally, the legacy of army rule has had an enduring influence on Nigeria’s political management. Many former army leaders have transitioned into civilian politics, bringing with them a hierarchical and authoritarian fashion of management that has at instances undermined democratic ideas (Ojo, 2017). This has contributed to a tradition of strongman politics, the place leaders usually centralize energy and suppress dissent to take care of management. There have been efforts, in recent times, to reform the nation’s political management and enhance governance requirements, by means of initiatives equivalent to anti-corruption campaigns and electoral reforms, to handle a number of the challenges dealing with the nation’s management (Adesina, 2020). Nevertheless, progress on this course has been very sluggish, and entrenched energy buildings proceed to pose obstacles to significant change. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW In analyzing how political leaders affect financial efficiency in Nigeria, one must be cognizant of the very fact that it’s the interplay of the political elite with the financial cycle that gives perception into how political establishments mediate the affect of the political elite on the financial system. Nigerian society has skilled appreciable political upheaval. Revenue inequality has elevated because the Sixties, and democratic political buildings haven’t been successfully tailored to mirror the adjustments in social buildings influenced by modernization. The erratic progress of democracy in Nigeria and its lack of ability to deal with the pressures of fast modernization have led to an erosion of perception within the efficacy of the social system. Many years of authoritarian or army rule in Nigeria have had a unfavorable influence on the standard of governance and the usual of dwelling of most Nigerians. Nigeria’s financial growth has been drastically influenced by quite a lot of historic, social, and political elements, together with pre-colonial commerce, colonial exploitation, post-independence insurance policies, and the oil increase. Within the pre-colonial interval, a number of thriving economies with very intensive commerce networks existed. For instance, the Yoruba city- states existed within the southwest, the Benin Kingdom within the southeast and the Hausa kingdoms within the north, engaged in agriculture and craft manufacturing, and traded, not solely amongst themselves, however with coastal and trans-Saharan merchants (Falola & Heaton, 2008). Then got here the Colonial Period, which lasted from 1861-1960, and considerably altered Nigeria’s financial panorama. Throughout this era, the British targeting extraction and exportation of uncooked supplies to feed the European Industrial Revolution. The financial system was designed to supply money crops like groundnuts, palm oil, cocoa and others to serve British pursuits (Ake, 1981). The Put up-Independence Industrialization interval, from 1960-1970 sought to remodel the colonial financial construction and speed up Nigeria’s industrial growth (Ekundare, 1973). Financial growth plans have been then designed by the federal government to advertise and help the diversification of the nation’s financial system from agriculture in direction of industrialization and infrastructural growth. This was adopted, within the Nineteen Seventies, by the interval of Nigeria’s Oil Growth, the place the issue of the nation was not cash however the best way to spend it. Oil contributed about 90% of international alternate earnings and over 80% of presidency revenues. The consequence was elevated urbanization and investments within the growth of infrastructure, however agriculture and different sectors have been virtually uncared for (Osoba, 1996). With help from the World Financial institution and the Worldwide Financial Fund (IMF), Nigeria adopted the Structural Adjustment Program in 1986. This was in response to the challenges of rising debt and falling oil costs. An essential objective of the SAP was to liberalize Nigeria’s financial system, help personal enterprise and decrease state involvement. Nevertheless, the instant social influence of the SAP was elevated poverty and inequality (Iyoha & Oriakhi, 2002). In 2004, the Nigeria launched the Nationwide Financial Empowerment and Growth Technique (NEEDS), specializing in poverty discount, financial diversification and infrastructure growth. The NEEDS targeted on the promotion of fine governance practices, personal sector participation, and social growth packages (Soludo, 2017). the Financial Restoration and Development Plan (ERGP) was launched in 2007 by the federal government to help and enhance agriculture, manufacturing and companies (Kalejaiye & Aliyu, 2013). One other coverage, the Imaginative and prescient 2020 Agendafollowed in 2009. The objective of the Imaginative and prescient 2020 was to place Nigeria as one of many prime 20 economies on the earth by 2020. It targeted on key sectors equivalent to agriculture, manufacturing, and companies, and referred to as for funding in human capital growth and infrastructure (Ibrahim, 2020). Since 1990 thus far, the nation has witnessed a mix of financial progress and setbacks. Whereas there was some type of stability when it comes to democratic governance and political stability, corruption-induced challenges, the shortage of financial diversification away from oil and lack of primary infrastructure nonetheless stay.
The affect of political management on the financial system has been evident in numerous insurance policies, choices, and actions taken by these in energy. One key instance of this may be seen of their administration of the nation’s huge pure sources, significantly oil. Nigeria is a serious oil producer, and the nation’s political leaders have usually used income from the oil sector to fund authorities packages and initiatives. Sadly, mismanagement, corruption, and lack of diversification have led to a scenario the place the financial system stays closely reliant on oil, making it susceptible to fluctuations in world oil costs (Oyekola, 2015). To be able to entice investments and spur financial growth, sound financial insurance policies, infrastructural growth and regulatory frameworks are very important. Nevertheless, political instability, coverage inconsistency, and corruption have usually deterred buyers, resulting in suboptimal financial efficiency (Onyishi, 2018). Additionally, choices in respect to authorities spending, foreign money stability, taxations and rates of interest, are essential elements that affect financial efficiency. Purposeful and efficient political management in these areas can result in sustainable financial progress, whereas poor choices, as Nigeria’s expertise has proven, exacerbate financial challenges(Akinbobola, 2019).
Nigeria has simply as a lot potential as nearly another developed nation and may present the identical enchancment if their authorities turns into really clear and accountable, specializing in making a conducive enabling setting for organizing Nigerian civil society to generate progress. The significance of political instability and poor governance to the decline of Nigeria’s enterprise local weather isn’t restricted to discouraging massive international buyers, nevertheless it additionally impacts small and medium-sized companies. Banks are additionally affected in a number of methods by the political instability and poor governance of the nation. Political instability contributes to a high-risk credit score market and decreased entry to credit score for the personal sector. The monetary sector is one space by which scientific and inner market work will be accomplished to ascertain how poor governance impacts Nigeria’s financial system.
POLITICAL ECONOMY THEORIES
The literature on political financial system (Mills, 2005) in addition to political enterprise cycle principle (Nordhaus & William, D, 1975) is wealthy with the explanation why politicians specifically would need to form economies. They’ve incentives to achieve from numerous types of hire looking for. Classical and neoliberal economists have give you mechanisms by means of which leaders can manipulate areas of the financial system to remain in energy. Politicians additionally comply with a social contract with residents to offer public items in return for a mandate to control. There are incentives for politicians to provide public items to take care of energy. Politicians might select to make use of financial coverage to develop a rustic’s productive capability or enhance nationwide welfare as a part of their stewardship. This may increasingly contain offering an enabling setting the place the personal sector prospers and produces many fascinating items and companies. Politicians may manipulate the financial system by buying and selling off some financial coverage in alternate for political survival. Political leaders stay an important financial brokers whose intentions to develop the financial system can influence on mixture productiveness and enhance financial outcomes.
Political financial system theories supply insights into the complicated interaction of establishments, pursuits and energy, in addition to totally different views on the connection between economics and politics. Some key political financial system theories embrace:
a. The Classical Political Financial system Concept, which started across the 18th and nineteenth centuries, was very distinguished and promoted by nice thinkers and famend economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo, amongst others. The classical political financial system principle emphasizes minimal authorities intervention, free markets and self-interests in driving financial outcomes. Proponents of the classical political financial system principle consider that general financial prosperity by means of the invisible hand mechanism (Smith, 1776), would consequence from self-interest.
b. The Marxist Political Financial system Concept: Developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the Marxist political financial system principle offers with the connection between social lessons, labour and capital. The inspiration of this principle is that capitalism is inherently exploitative, therefore proponents of Marxist political financial system principle advocate for the overthrow of the capitalist system (Marx, 1867), and the institution of a classless society rooted within the widespread possession of th technique of manufacturing.
c. The Institutional Political Financial system Concept: The Institutional Political Financial system Concept is described as a fusion of financial evaluation with political science and sociological insights, to be able to correctly look at how financial behaviour and outcomes are formed by establishments. The idea highlights the importance and affect of formal and casual guidelines and norms, together with energy buildings in financial decision-making (North, 1990). Establishments have the capability to both promote or hinder financial growth and social welfare.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA
Financial progress is a major contributor and needed element of financial growth. Financial growth is the creation of enabling situations that promote and stimulate fast and substantial improve within the primary materials well-being of the bulk. That is achievable by the implementation of political management insurance policies to advertise financial progress by means of land reforms, capital intensive industrialization, instructional stimulus and efficient public well being system. Financial growth should be measured by means of such areas because the discount within the alternatives for malnutrition, the appreciable discount in excessive toddler mortality charges, the supply of potable water, the supply of entry to high quality instructional materials, the expansion of public well being, larger alternatives for employment, the gradual socio-economic degree generated by the vast majority of the folks whereby a median degree of society is established, the discount within the degree of excessive inflation and unemployment, indices of per-capita earnings, and thru the environment friendly allocation of sources in regulating the kind of social relationships. The time period “financial growth” will be seen from the angle of a false dichotomy within the growth course of. The dichotomy resulted because of the figuring out of financial growth with the development of the “middle” (the extra developed and industrialized nations, normally capitalist, on the one hand) and the probabilities of the “periphery” (viz the much less developed, under-developed, undeveloped or creating nations, usually nations of Asia, Africa and Latin America, on the opposite. What the political economist referred to steadily as “financial progress” – a sustained improve within the output of products and companies of a rustic, normally measured at one sector of the financial system most instances by means of the rise of the Gross Nationwide product (as one of many types of indicators of financial growth) is usually confused with financial growth itself. Traditionally, Nigeria’s financial growth has developed considerably, formed by its wealthy endowment of pure sources, governmental insurance policies, and its interactions inside the world financial system. Nigeria’s oil and gasoline sector accounts for about 90% of export earnings and greater than 50% of presidency income (Central Financial institution of Nigeria, 2022). This over-dependence on oil and gasoline has made the nation’s financial system extremely inclined to world oil value fluctuations. Efforts have been intensified in current instances, to diversify the financial system by means of the event of the agricultural sector, which accounts for about 70% of the labour power and about 24% of the nation’s GDP (Nationwide Bureau of Statistics, 2022). The Manufacturing sector, although nonetheless nascent, holds nice promise, when it comes to its contributions to the nation’s GDP. That is the clear focus of the Nigeria Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP), designed to help the manufacturing sector to turn into globally aggressive by growing the sector’s manufacturing base (Federal Ministry of Trade, Commerce and Funding, 2022). The companies sector has recorded the quickest progress in Nigeria, with telecommunications driving the growth of cell telephony and web penetration. The monetary companies business has been revolutionized, enhancing monetary inclusion (PwC, 2023). Regardless of such progress, particularly within the companies sector, Nigeria’s financial growth remains to be hampered by challenges of corruption, insecurity, political instability, and unacceptable unemployment price, particularly among the many nation’s youth inhabitants. Poverty can be widespread, as a good portion of the nation’s human inhabitants continues to reside under the poverty line. Nigeria’s political leaders are at present, additionally strained by modern socio-economic and geopolitical issues.
INTERPLAY BETWEEN POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The interaction between political management and financial growth in Nigeria is profound and deeply influential, presenting a mixture of alternatives and challenges through the years. Relying on the character of management, typically army and typically civilian, centralized versus decentralized, this interaction between political management and financial growth in Nigeria has been marked by vital shifts. Persistent points equivalent to corruption and political instability stay vital limitations. The trail to sustainable financial growth in Nigeria relies upon largely on the emergence of clear, accountable, and efficient political management. Financial insurance policies and outcomes are instantly impacted by political management. For instance, Nigeria witnessed vital regional disparities as a result of political and ethnic tensions, throughout Nigeria First Republic (1960-1966), which drastically influenced developmental insurance policies and financial growth choices (Falola & Heaton, 2008). From the late Sixties to late Nineteen Nineties, the Nigeria witnessed lengthy durations of army regimes, with centralized management over decision-making and financial sources. Nigeria returned to civil rule in 1999, signaling a major turning level for the nation’s political and financial panorama. The Federal Authorities then, led by President Olusegun Obasanjo, from 1999- 2007, initiated vital financial insurance policies, together with banking sector reforms, privatization and the warfare in opposition to corruption to advertise Nigeria’s progress and financial stability (Utomi, 2013). Regardless of these encouraging efforts, corruption, insurgency, political instability, and insufficient infrastructure have continued to impede substantial financial progress. Assets that may very well be utilized for financial growth have been drained by political corruption, as a result of large-scale mismanagement and embezzlement of funds by political leaders (Ekanade, 2014), considerably hampering Nigeria’s financial growth. The institution of establishments such because the ICPC and the EFCC demonstrates management dedication to combating corruption. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of those establishments has depended largely, on the management’s dedication and political local weather (Agbiboa, 2012). Political management seeks to recast the financial system, the foundations of the establishment of property and manufacturing, and the distributional advantages from financial progress and stability; it seeks to redistribute property and manufacturing, enunciates and enforces written and principled guidelines of business conduct in order that expertise, expertise, data, and different technique of manufacturing are deployed effectively on the ranges of the company sector, whereas acceptable distributional privileges are punctuated; and it seeks to guard and defend property rights, and to manage the conduct and conduct of financial brokers inside the phrases of written and enforced guidelines. The governance construction can both facilitate or hinder the belief of the goal and aims of political management.
CONCLUSION
Political management is prime within the means of governance, in direction of the achievement of fascinating aims, together with financial growth, social integration, public well-being, and such different associated objectives. Nevertheless, political leaders might influence the financial system in various methods, equivalent to their political orientation and beliefs. Moreover, political management is predicted to engineer the financial system in direction of larger efficiency by means of numerous operative mechanisms like coverage formulation, decision-making, implementation, and the analysis of insurance policies. It’s these capabilities that permit political leaders to make use of public sources to create worth for the development of the dwelling requirements of a rustic, whereas on the identical time working to broaden social welfare, as an illustration, by growing employment. Though political management’s corresponding affect on financial growth can have vital penalties, both by means of its influence on coverage change pushed by its switch of energy from one set of political actors to a different, or by altering expectations and beliefs, political regimes can form patterns of financial growth and distributions. Such leaders can act as a mannequin, man of motion, nice communicator, or transformational chief, whereas others have been seen as folks of imaginative and prescient pursuit specializing in creativity and threat persuasiveness inspiring belief to make issues occur, society builder, nation-builder(s), nation transformer, and lots of extra. Good political management creates an setting that promotes financial growth. Intriguingly, corruption in any respect ranges of governance, poor accountability and transparency have been recognized because the bane of the underdevelopment of many African nations together with Nigeria. To search out options to those issues, this work has investigated the affect of political management on financial growth in Nigeria. The paper is anchored on the legitimacy principle which emphasizes the significance of public confidence and belief in government-to-government effectiveness. The examine adopted the quasi-experimental analysis design with the secondary supply of information as the one supply of information assortment. Information analyzed have been obtained from secondary sources utilizing content material evaluation. The analysis discovered that political management influences financial growth in Nigeria starting from ineffective utilization of sources, embezzlement of public funds, unhealthy governance, poor service, and insufficient degree of socialization, and encouragement of corrupt practices amongst public officers. This paper means that extra consideration must be paid to the challenges on the institutional construction and the political system in Nigeria. These challenges name for vital measures geared toward selling good political management in Nigeria. For Nigeria to realize her worthy objectives as a aggressive and prospering nation, Nigerians should decide to re-establishing worth for the widespread good, a superb society, group, dialogue, tolerance, fraternity, and self-identity, fostering a mutual sense of belonging in full participation and well-being. Moreover, initiating agile companies reflecting due transparency and inspiring duty amongst all its leaders in any respect ranges, in good religion and uprightness, and manifesting self-pride. To this finish, the paper advocates for the pressing want for enhancing ethical management and selling real politics when it comes to the inviolability of life, perennial morals, and the preservation of the human setting, and democracy for social and civil rights.
IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
When political leaders are unjust, oppressive and manipulative, it turns into troublesome to share the objectives of the elite, and consequently stifle efforts towards progress and growth. Nevertheless, and usefully, imaginative and prescient, political will, attributes of democratic inclusiveness and transformational qualities make nice leaders able to main growth and nation mobilization into prosperity, democracy and growth. A way of nationwide curiosity because the cardinal level of management informs the communal spirit of visionary political management in constructing and remolding the construction of a nation state. In conclusion, all historic trajectories to excessive progress in rising economies have been marked by targeted consideration to structural change by political management. On this sense, an inclusive method and response from the political management in Nigeria locations some optimism within the quest for long-term progress and financial progress. Management on the degree of nation-states had a larger influence on progress and growth than at any greater degree. A creating nation’s personal management had the main duty to provoke, information and tempo its progress course of. Historical past and profitable fashions of change present a message of hope, that with the appropriate insurance policies, attributes and tendencies of its leaders, good nations can turn into higher. Nevertheless, at different instances political leaders thwart the event of their nations by means of corrupt practices and greed that undermines growth aims.
REFERENCES
1. Akande, J. (2016). Ethnicity, Faith and Corruption in Nigeria. African Journal of Politics & Society, 3(2), 87-101.
2. Ake, C. (1981). _A Political Financial system of Africa_. Longman.
3. Akinbobola, M. (2019). Fiscal Coverage and Financial Efficiency in Nigeria: An Empirical Evaluation, Nigerian Journal of Economics, 22(3), 56-71.
4. Akindele, R.A., & Ate, B.E. (2012). Nigeria and the ECOWAS since 1985: In the direction of an Rationalization of a Paid Piper and his Unchanged Tune. Nigerian Discussion board.
5. Ajakaiye, O., & Adedeji, O. (2018). Colonialism and Financial Growth in Nigeria: A Evaluate of Its Influence. Journal of African Growth Research, 11(2), 45-60.
6. Central Financial institution of Nigeria. (2022). Annual Report. Retrieved from [cbn.gov.ng](https://www.cbn.gov.ng)
7. Ekanade, O. (2014). *The Dynamics of Compelled Neoliberalism in Nigeria because the Eighties*. Ibadan: Indiana College Press.
8. Ekundare, R. O. (1973). _An Financial Historical past of Nigeria 1860-1960_. Africana Publishing Company.
9. Falola, T., & Heaton, M. M. (2008). _A Historical past of Nigeria_. Cambridge College Press.
10. Federal Ministry of Trade, Commerce, and Funding. (2022). Nigeria Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP). Retrieved from [trade.gov.ng](https://www.commerce.gov.ng)
11. Ibrahim, A. B. (2020). Financial Restoration and Development Plan (ERGP): A Pathway to Sustainable Growth in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Financial Growth, 33(2), 55-70.
12. Iyoha, M. A., & Oriakhi, D. E. (2002). Explaining African Financial Development Efficiency: The Case of Nigeria (Draft Remaining Report). African Financial Analysis Consortium.
13. Kalejaiye, P. O., & Alliyu, N. (2013). The Rise of China and Africa’s Financial Transformation: An Evaluation of Nigerian Commerce Relations with China. _Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development_, 4(5), 62-72.
14. Klarin, J. (2020). The Position of Political Management in Financial Growth. Financial Journal, 25(3), 35-50
15. Lewis, P. M. (2007). *Rising Aside: Oil, Politics, and Financial Change in Indonesia and Nigeria*. College of Michigan Press.
16. Mankiw, N.G., & Taylor, M.P. (2014). Economics. Cengage Studying.
17. Marx. Ok. (1867). Capital: Critique of Political Financial system. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
18. Mills, C. W. (2005). “Globalizing Historic Materialism: A Dialog with Charles Mills.” Socialism and Democracy, 19(1), 177-202.
19. Nationwide Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Nigerian Gross Home Product Report. Retrieved from [nigerianstat.gov.ng] (https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng)
20. Nnanna, O. J. (2019). Financial Reform and Governance in Nigeria: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Journal of African Financial Growth, 14(4), 120-135.
21. Nordhaus, William D. “The political enterprise cycle.” The Evaluate of Financial Research 42.1 (1975): 169-190.
22. North, D.C. (1990). Establishments, Institutional Change, and Financial Efficiency. Cambridge College Press.
23. Ogunleye, O., & Adeleye, I. (2018). Challenges of Financial Growth in Nigeria: The Position of
Coverage Inconsistencies and Institutional Frameworks. Journal of African Economics, 42(2), 65-80.
24. Ojo, O. (2017). Army Rule, Democracy Transition, and Political Management in Nigeria. Journal of African Political Research, 4(3), 112-128.
25. Oyekola, Ok. (2015). Oil Wealth and Financial Growth in Nigeria: Challenges and Alternatives. African Growth Evaluate, 17(2), 78-94.
26. Onyishi, E. (2018). Political Instability and Overseas Direct Funding in Nigeria. Journal of Political Financial system, 35(1), 124-139.
27. Osoba, S. O. (1996). Corruption in Nigeria: Historic Views. _Review of African Political Economy_, 23(69), 371-386.
28. PwC. (2023). The rise of fintech in Nigeria: Challenges and alternatives. Retrieved from [pwc.com] (https://www.pwc.com).
29. Ross, M. L. (2015). The Politics of the Useful resource Curse: A Evaluate. Developments within the Economics of Pure Assets, 25(1), 35-50.
30. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
31. Soludo, C. (2017). Oil, Financial Diversification, and Sustainable Growth in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Financial Coverage, 30(3), 72-88.
32. UK Essays. (2018). Why is Nigeria Referred to as the Large of Africa? Retrieved from
[https://www.ukessays.com/](https://www.ukessays.com/essays/historical past/why-is-nigeria-called-the[1]giant-of-africa.php).
33. Utomi, P. (2013). *Nigeria’s Path to Progress: In the direction of Financial Restoration and Accelerated Growth*. Lagos: Africana Management Academy
First publication: Worldwide Journal of Analysis and Innovation in Social Science (ISSN 2454-6186), vol. VIII, subject VII, July 2024, p. 1274-1282, https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.807106 Obtained: 17 June 2024; Revised: 30 June 2024; Accepted: 04 July 2024; Revealed: 07 August 2024.
Illustrative Photograph by Christina Morillo: https://www.pexels.com/photograph/black-and-gray-laptop-computer-turned-on-doing-computer-codes-1181271/
