by Li-Yin Liu & Wei-Ting Yen
Whereas folks in nations akin to the USA had been discontented and closely against stricter COVID-19 mitigation measures, why did people in some democratic societies voluntarily request and assist stringent insurance policies? This was our central analysis query in our current article printed in Coverage & Politics.
Securitisation students argue that the exceptionalism of permitting the federal government to limit folks’s liberties and allocate extra sources to sure insurance policies outcomes from profitable securitisation—a persuasive course of that convinces folks that COVID-19 is a nationwide safety risk.
Nonetheless, regardless of in depth research making use of securitisation idea to public well being crises, current analysis usually lacks empirical information. Moreover, securitisation idea doesn’t clearly outline “exceptionalism,” nor does it clarify why profitable securitisation results in public assist for some insurance policies however not throughout all associated coverage areas.
Subsequently, to deal with this hole, we used the Narrative Coverage Framework (NPF) to look at COVID-19 securitisation in Taiwan. Evaluation of a conjoint experiment performed simply after the Taiwanese authorities determined to maneuver away from its zero-COVID coverage demonstrated that variations in public assist for various COVID-19 coverage dimensions resulted from the morals of tales inside its COVID-19 securitisation narratives. As a result of these narratives in Taiwan portrayed COVID-19 as an exterior risk to nationwide safety, they justified and gained public assist for border-related restrictions. Moreover, the portrayal of the medical masks manufacturing staff as heroes and masks as a protect to defend resulted in assist for masks mandates.
Our research contributes to the literature on securitising public well being and enhances our understanding of the impact of profitable securitisation by using the NPF to clarify how the content material of securitisation language might result in variation within the exceptionalism of a well being disaster mitigation coverage combine.
The significance of those findings is to spotlight the significance for researchers and policymakers to fastidiously contemplate coverage narrative contents to successfully talk and garner assist for a variety of insurance policies throughout occasions of disaster.
You’ll be able to learn the unique analysis in Coverage & Politics at
Liu, L., & Yen, W. (2024). Why do people in democratic societies assist stringent insurance policies? A story coverage framework evaluation. Coverage & Politics, 52(3), 453-476 from https://doi.org/10.1332/030557324X17049690476008
If you happen to loved this weblog submit, you might also have an interest to learn:
Kim, J. H., Kuk, J., & Kweon, Y. (2024). Did low-income important employees throughout COVID-19 improve public assist for redistribution?. Coverage & Politics, 52(3), 430-452. Retrieved Sep 11, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2023D000000008
MacAulay, M., Fafard, P., Cassola, A., & Palkovits, M. (2023). Analysing the ‘observe the science’ rhetoric of presidency responses to COVID-19. Coverage & Politics, 51(3), 466-485 from https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16831146677554
van den Dool, A., & Qiu, T. (2024). Coverage processes in China: a scientific assessment of the a number of streams framework. Coverage & Politics (printed on-line forward of print 2024) from https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000038
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25614766/Screenshot_2024_09_10_at_1.36.21_PM.png?w=150&resize=150,150&ssl=1 "Italy Twofer: 9/11 Giro della Toscana; 9/12 Coppa Sabatini")
