It’s all the time heartwarming to satisfy a detailed good friend after a very long time. I skilled such a joyful second final week once I reunited with a former colleague I had labored with on the identical firm, in the identical space of macroeconomic reporting, after a few years, throughout his go to to Seoul for a vacation.
We mentioned many subjects, starting from our day by day lives since leaving the corporate a number of years in the past to our ideas on the result of the US presidential election — which had been determined simply hours earlier than we met in central Seoul — and main economies’ future prospects.
Our dialog was largely relaxed till he posed an intriguing query that apparently pertains to his present position of enhancing financial studies written by journalists. “Will you purchase South Korea now?” he requested, including that he wasn’t simply referring to the inventory of South Korean corporations.
It wasn’t a simple query to reply instantly — or at the least that’s the way it felt initially. After a second, I replied, “Hmm, I’d say ‘no’ within the brief time period, however ‘perhaps sure’ over the long run.” I don’t exactly bear in mind what I took into consideration once I answered.
I didn’t instantly point out the widely disappointing outcomes achieved because the authorities introduced an formidable plan earlier this yr dubbed the Company Worth-up Program, geared toward boosting the worth of shares in robust corporations undervalued as a result of so-called “Korea low cost.”
The administration of President Yoon Suk Yeol launched this system in February with the goal of creating investments in South Korean shares extra interesting. Since then, extra particulars about this system have been disclosed via information conferences by prime policymakers, worldwide seminars for students and market specialists, and the publication of analysis papers.
Nonetheless, these particulars appear to have failed to spice up investor confidence in this system or South Korean belongings total, as mirrored in inventory costs and foreign money actions. Traders notice that South Korea’s Company Worth-up Program depends totally on voluntary efforts by corporations to enhance shareholder worth.
As an illustration, the Kospi is presently buying and selling 4 % beneath its degree from the start of this yr. This efficiency contrasts starkly with the spectacular beneficial properties of inventory indices in different international locations with which South Korea’s financial system is commonly in contrast, as a result of their shut relationships or similarities.
Throughout this era, Taiwan’s primary inventory index rose 32 %, the US’ Nasdaq composite index jumped 31 %, Japan’s Nikkei 225 index surged 19 % and China’s Shanghai Inventory Trade index elevated 17 %. Even Israel’s primary inventory index, regardless of its wars within the Gaza Strip, Lebanon and elsewhere, recorded a notable acquire of 16 % because the begin of the yr.
These developments are happening at the same time as the federal government touts a pointy rebound in exports, led by key export gadgets like semiconductors, ships, vehicles and industrial equipment. The federal government introduced earlier this month that abroad gross sales in October rose 4.6 % on-year to $57.52 billion.
October marked the thirteenth consecutive month that exports rose on-year and the third month wherein abroad shipments broke the month-to-month report, based on the Ministry of Commerce, Trade and Power. It’s exhausting to disclaim that this robust export efficiency bodes effectively for the general financial system, company earnings and, by extension, inventory costs.
Nonetheless, the fact is sort of the alternative: Korea’s financial progress stays sluggish, company earnings aren’t rising shortly sufficient to excite buyers and inventory costs aren’t rising in any respect — notably when put next with markets in vital economies just like the US, Taiwan and Japan.
The Seoul inventory market hasn’t responded strongly even after the Democratic Celebration of Korea, the principle opposition celebration holding greater than half the seats in parliament, agreed to the ruling celebration’s demand to cancel the deliberate funding revenue tax scheme.
Beneath the funding revenue tax, which had initially been set to take impact subsequent yr, capital beneficial properties over 50 million gained (about $37,000) from inventory investments would have been topic to a 20 % tax, whereas beneficial properties over 300 million gained would have incurred a 25 % tax.
Traders had lengthy demanded the cancellation of this plan, arguing that it could impose “double taxation” and push buyers away from the native market. But the Seoul inventory market hasn’t risen as anticipated because the primary opposition celebration agreed to cancel the tax, and buyers proceed to favor abroad markets for increased returns.
Underlying this gloomy outlook is the disappointing financial efficiency in each the current and predicted for the close to future.
The federal government is slicing spending, the central financial institution is hesitating, corporations will not be considerably rising home funding or employment, households will not be borrowing extra, and their revenue is rising too slowly to help extra consumption.
What went mistaken and who’s guilty? Ask your self: “Would you purchase South Korea?” And, “If not, why not?”
Yoo Choon-sik
Yoo Choon-sik labored for almost 30 years at Reuters, together with because the chief Korea economics correspondent, and briefly labored as a enterprise technique advisor. The views expressed listed below are the author’s personal. — Ed.